In recent years, various levels of the military have continuously relaxed and reduced the burden on the grassroots, and grassroots battalions and companies have achieved good results in independently promoting construction. However, the reporter learned during an interview with a squatting unit in the military that some grassroots military leaders, due to insufficient awareness of the rule of law, still have varying degrees of arbitrary implementation and self strengthening during the construction process. For example, some grassroots military leaders, in implementing regulatory requirements, blindly pursue form and highlights in order to win the impression of their superiors, resulting in a focus on the surface rather than the interior, and a mediocre view rather than practical use; Some people excessively interpret the requirements of their superiors, arbitrarily raise standards, leading to excessive pressure and fatigue on officers and soldiers... To rectify these problems, all levels should adhere to the work philosophy of "putting grassroots first and soldiers first", clarify the work concept of relying on grassroots and strengthening grassroots, and carry out construction in accordance with laws, regulations, and guidelines, constantly changing the work style. At the same time, efforts should be made to guide grassroots military leaders to establish a correct concept of the rule of law, consciously lead troops in accordance with the law, and truly implement good policies and regulations. The phenomenon of rectification: ① Setting the length and quantity of reading experience, emphasizing the importance of true feelings and insights. "Reading has always been a habit for me, and it can take me to a broader distance..." Recently, at a "reading sharing meeting" organized by a certain company of a certain brigade of the 83rd Group Army, soldier Xiao Cheng shared his experience and insights on being associated with books with the general public. In communication, everyone generally feels that writing reading reflections now only requires expressing genuine emotions and feelings, without worrying too much about the number and length of articles. Such activities are indeed beneficial for both body and mind. In the past, reading sharing activities organized by individual units once made officers and soldiers feel embarrassed. During an education campaign, a government official went to a certain company to listen to a lecture and found that some soldiers were listless and even dozing off. It is understood that during that period, in order to advocate for officers and soldiers to read more and read good books, relevant departments distributed a batch of high-quality books to the grassroots. That platoon attaches great importance and plans to organize a weekly "book sharing meeting" to achieve the goal of joint learning and improvement among officers and soldiers. When deploying work, some soldiers were asked to write a book review in order to show their subordinates a face in the organization and platoon, and also to benefit themselves. They emphasized the importance of having enough articles and length, carefully polishing them, striving for novelty, and making them 'eye-catching'. "The class monitor felt that my learning experience was not sufficient," "The platoon leader thought that the quality standard of my article was not high." During the activity, some soldiers' reading experiences were repeatedly requested to be revised. "Sometimes before I finish reading a book and fully understand it, I am asked to submit my thoughts and experiences as soon as possible." Soldier Xiaoli admitted that due to heavy training tasks, he can only use his spare time to read and write his thoughts and experiences. As a result, many rest time is occupied, which affects the quality and effectiveness of training and education. "Writing reading reflections was originally an effective measure to enhance educational effectiveness, but if one disregards the actual situation of soldiers, emphasizes the length and number of articles and the so-called 'standards', and regards them as their own work achievements, it not only violates the rights and interests of officers and soldiers, but also goes against the original intention of the activity." This cadre immediately stopped such phenomena and criticized the relevant personnel of the platoon