According to reports, multiple platforms have introduced new tools such as "artificial intelligence and AI filling" this year, generating "college entrance examination volunteer filling" consulting products. There are also hundreds of apps related to them in mobile app stores. At the same time, many illegal individuals have also targeted the field of voluntary reporting and implemented fraud. Overall, this AI service provides a certain reference for candidates to accurately fill out their applications. But too many institutions, lured in by huge interests, have also led to uneven service quality, and some unscrupulous individuals also believe that there is an opportunity to take advantage of it and extend their black hands to candidates and parents. The risks involved cannot be ignored. Using AI as a gimmick to attract candidates and parents is not new this year. A candidate complained that "none of the six universities suggested by AI were accepted, with a claimed success rate of over 70%. In the end, I enrolled in the guaranteed university that I filled out myself, which is 20 points lower than the college entrance examination score." If the above risks come from the limitations of AI as a technical means and the exaggeration of its role, then the greater risk faced by candidates and parents comes from criminals using the guise of AI to set traps. For example, a consulting agency has advertised "successfully partnering with C9, 985, and 211 universities" and "forming a team of authoritative volunteer filling experts from well-known affiliated universities". And in the end, the police confirmed that this matter was purely fictitious. Once caught in such traps, parents lose money and their children's studies are hindered. In addition, using AI service volunteers to fill out applications, in addition to ensuring the authenticity and accuracy of the information provided, there is a risk of personal information and privacy leakage during the filling out and querying process of relevant information. This requires candidates and parents to be vigilant, but as "insiders", they are easily trapped and unable to extricate themselves. Once risks are discovered, the harmful consequences often occur. A more ideal approach is to prevent potential problems through timely and effective supervision by relevant departments. For example, should we set standardized management standards for this industry? Can market regulatory authorities promptly investigate and punish exaggerated propaganda such as boasting about "accurate reporting" to avoid misleading more people? Can the public security organs intervene in cases with signs of fraud as soon as possible? When candidates and parents keep a vigilant eye and relevant departments implement effective supervision, the risk of AI filling out their applications is minimized, so that candidates and parents can confidently enjoy the fruits of technological progress. (New News Agency)