Not long ago, Ouyang Ziyuan, Du Xiangwan, Fu Tingdong and other scientists were invited to have a dialogue with young scientific and technological workers by the CCTV's "Open Talk" program to discuss how to inherit the spirit of scientists. This is a part of the "2022 National Science Ethics and Study Style Construction Publicity Month" jointly carried out by the China Association for Science and Technology and the Ministry of Education. Publicity Month promotes a good style of scientific research and learning through TV programs, lectures, dramas, exhibitions and other forms, and is well received by all sectors of society. A good style of study in scientific research is an indispensable soil for the rooting and growth of scientific research achievements. A bad style of study not only affects the effectiveness and direction of scientific and technological innovation, but also is not conducive to scientific and technological workers winning social respect and realizing the value of life. In recent years, China has made great efforts to strengthen the construction of style and style of study. The Office of the Central Committee and the Office of the State Council have successively issued Several Opinions on Further Strengthening the Construction of Scientific Research Integrity and Opinions on Further Promoting the Spirit of Scientists and Strengthening the Construction of Style and Style of Study, to build a solid institutional guarantee for a good style of study and style of work from the top-level design level, and promote the construction of style of study to go deeper and more practical. In May this year, the Chinese Scientists' Spiritual Mission was officially established, and the activity of "entering universities, institutions and enterprises" was launched. A series of "combination fists" have improved the style of study of the majority of scientific and technological workers and provided a strong spiritual support for scientific and technological innovation. At present, scientific and technological innovation has a profound impact on the future and destiny of the country and the well-being of the people. It is more necessary to carry forward the spirit of scientists and the fine style of study, and encourage scientific and technological workers to continue to march towards the breadth and depth of scientific and technological innovation. It is undeniable that bad style of study still exists to a certain extent. Although these problems only exist in individual fields and individuals, their negative effects should not be underestimated. To solve these problems, we must strengthen the construction of the style of study and work style, guide scientific and technological workers to practice the spirit of scientists, and aspire to be the university and true knowledge of the country and the people. Example is the best example. Being down-to-earth, rigorous and realistic is an excellent tradition in China's scientific and technological circles. From Deng Jiaxian, Qian Sanqiang, Guo Yonghuai and other older generation scientists to Huang Danian, Nan Rendong, Zhong Yang and other new era examples, generations of scientists have formed a strong example force with lofty moral character and excellent style of study, leading scientific and technological workers to forge ahead. From inviting scientists of virtue and learning to give a report on the style of study to the "first button" of young teachers and students in their scientific research career, the national publicity and education work on scientific ethics and the construction of the style of study has adhered to innovation in content and rich forms in recent years, playing an important role in promoting the spirit of scientists, advocating scientific research integrity, and cultivating a good style of study. Further strengthening model leading and example driving, and telling a good story about scientists will help to better enhance the scientific and technological ethics awareness of the majority of scientific and technological workers and the public, and create a good atmosphere for achieving high-level scientific and technological self-reliance. To establish the "high line", we should also draw a clear "red line", hold the "bottom line", and strengthen the education and punishment of academic misconduct. Only by constantly improving fair, transparent and operable investigation and handling procedures and rules, can scientific research be clearly defined