What do university administrators care about about organized research

2022-10-24

Author: Xu Jie (researcher of the National Institute of Education Administration) The 14th University Managers Forum was recently held in the National Institute of Education Administration. Focusing on the theme of the forum, "Promoting organized scientific research in colleges and universities, supporting high-level self-reliance", the keynote speakers and trainees of the forum held a warm discussion around the theme of the forum, especially the dialogue link of the forum, which let us see the importance of organized scientific research, University administrators' concerns. First, how to carry out team assessment? Organized scientific research focuses on team promotion. An important link in team building and development is assessment. How can the work of team members be reflected in the professional title review? According to the previous exploration of universities in this field, some of the professional titles are evaluated at the school level, and some are delegated to the hospital level. No matter at which level, the leaders of teachers' teams have a great voice, which relates to two issues: "It is good to enjoy the cool under a tree" and "there is no grass under a tree". During the discussion, the participants believed that organized scientific research should fully draw on previous experience in the evaluation and assessment, and adopt more effective strategies in the evaluation and assessment, so as to give play to the enthusiasm of team members. The second is how organized scientific research can break the situation. For example, in recent years, various schools have been engaged in a lot of talent training projects for integrated circuits, covering undergraduate and graduate levels, as well as projects that are connected with undergraduate, graduate and doctoral programs. However, if professors can't make chips and our industry has not overcome them, how can these projects cultivate talents? During the discussion, the participants believed that the basic theories and principles of these cutting-edge technologies were mastered by the tutors and professors of relevant disciplines and could lead students to learn. At present, some schools have invested heavily in teaching and research equipment around the project, providing a better platform for learning and tackling key problems, which is worth looking forward to. In addition, we need to see that any scientific research breakthrough will take time and process. For example, the chips in Taiwan and the photolithography technology in Eindhoven, the Netherlands, have been accumulated for many years before coming out of the cocoon. It is worth mentioning that the progress made in cutting-edge science and technology overseas is basically the result of close cooperation between industry, university and research. Therefore, we should pay special attention to giving play to the advantages of both schools and enterprises in organized scientific research, especially the advantages of the industry in application scenarios. We should put the latest technology scenario application products into teaching as teaching cases. Third, how to conduct organized scientific research in humanities and social sciences colleges and universities. Most of the humanities and social sciences do not need to do experiments, do not need laboratories, and some research is purely personal and does not need teams. Participants in the discussion believed that organized research is not "one size fits all", requiring everyone to do organized research, but starting from the characteristics of the discipline. However, it should be emphasized that the humanities and social sciences colleges and universities have a great role to play in the organized scientific research. For example, the unexpected and unique learning like Dunhuang Studies needs organized scientific research to ensure its inheritance, and archaeology needs organized scientific research. As for some social science disciplines, such as the study of mining areas, the rule of law in mining needs the participation of law, the common prosperity of mining areas needs the participation of economics and management, and the education of some enterprises in mining areas needs the integration of ideology and politics, etc. Fourth, yes

Edit:sishi    Responsible editor:xingyong

Source:https://epaper.gmw.cn/gmrb/html/

Special statement: if the pictures and texts reproduced or quoted on this site infringe your legitimate rights and interests, please contact this site, and this site will correct and delete them in time. For copyright issues and website cooperation, please contact through outlook new era email:lwxsd@liaowanghn.com

Return to list

Recommended Reading Change it

Links

Submission mailbox:lwxsd@liaowanghn.com Tel:020-817896455

粤ICP备19140089号 Copyright © 2019 by www.lwxsd.com.all rights reserved

>