On the occasion of the one-year anniversary of the implementation of the Anti Telecommunications Network Fraud Law, the Supreme People's Procuratorate today released typical cases of procuratorial organs punishing telecommunications network fraud and related crimes in accordance with the law. There are a total of 11 cases, which comprehensively reveal the characteristics of current telecommunications network fraud and its related crimes. Through case interpretation, it serves as a warning to the public to strengthen their self-protection awareness and enhance their ability to prevent fraud. The typical cases in this batch are: fraud cases involving Liu and others; Zheng and seven others engaged in fraud and illegal crossing of national (border) borders; Case of fraud and infringement of personal information of citizens by Wang and others; The fraud case involving Li and others; Case of Bao and others infringing on personal information of citizens; Li and others engaged in fraud, infringing on citizens' personal information, and concealing or concealing criminal gains; Case of Zhong and six others concealing and concealing criminal gains; Fraud case involving Wang and others; Wang is suspected of concealing and concealing criminal gains; The Nantong Procuratorate in Jiangsu Province supervises and standardizes the batch application of fixed line telephone services to prevent administrative public interest litigation cases related to telecommunications network fraud; The Nanming District Procuratorate of Guiyang City, Guizhou Province urges the standardization of administrative public interest litigation cases related to the supervision of fraudulent enterprise business licenses. These 11 typical cases involve 9 criminal cases and 2 public interest litigation cases. Among them, Case One and Case Two mainly demonstrate the trend of the procuratorial organs cracking down heavily on cross-border telecommunications network fraud crimes in accordance with the law, releasing a strong signal of strict punishment; Case 3 and Case 4 mainly expose new types of telecommunications network fraud crimes, warning the public to improve their awareness and ability to prevent fraud and fraud; Case 5, Case 6, and Case 7 mainly demonstrate the full chain punishment of telecommunications network fraud and related crimes by the procuratorial organs; In Case 8, the procuratorial organs integrated the recovery of stolen goods and damages throughout the entire judicial process, strengthening the application of leniency in confession and punishment, and organically combining the recovery of stolen goods and damages; In case 9, the procuratorial organ promptly transferred the suspect to the administrative organ after making a relatively non prosecution according to law, and implemented the reverse connection mechanism of execution; Case 10 and Case 11 mainly demonstrate the effectiveness of procuratorial public interest litigation in promoting the prevention of telecommunications network fraud crimes. Next, the procuratorial organs will further increase their efforts to punish according to law, strengthen the recovery of gains and losses, promote source control, and effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the people and social stability. (Lai Xin She)