Discipline inspection and supervision are at the backbone of the Party and state supervision system, and audit supervision is an important component of the Party and state supervision system, both of which are important forces in promoting the modernization of the national governance system and governance capabilities. Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, under the centralized and unified leadership of the Party Central Committee, disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies have actively played a role in assisting, guiding, and promoting. Inspection agencies and audit agencies have actively cooperated, and the pace of coordination and linkage between disciplinary inspection and audit has accelerated. They have further integrated supervision resources, utilized the advantages of the supervision system, and effectively investigated and dealt with a large number of corruption cases. The 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China made strategic arrangements for improving the Party's unified leadership, comprehensive coverage, and authoritative and efficient supervision system. The second plenary session of the 20th Central Commission for Discipline Inspection made specific arrangements for promoting the integration and coordination of disciplinary inspection and supervision, inspection and supervision, and audit supervision. On the new journey, we must steadfastly implement the decisions and deployments of the Party Central Committee, strengthen the coordination of various supervision, especially the supervision of disciplinary inspections and reviews, make greater efforts in the integration of forces, procedures, and work integration, consolidate the joint efforts of anti-corruption work, and promote the comprehensive and strict governance of the Party to develop in depth. Improve institutional mechanisms and promote more scientific and efficient coordination and cooperation. In June last year, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, the National Supervisory Commission, the Central Audit Office, the Audit Office, and the Central Inspection Office jointly issued relevant guidance opinions, providing a strong institutional guarantee for promoting the coordination of disciplinary inspections and audits. Many places have also established corresponding mechanisms and issued implementation opinions, clarifying the content and methods of supervision and cooperation, and continuously expanding cooperation channels. We must implement relevant institutional regulations and promptly elevate beneficial practices into institutional mechanisms in practice. Discipline inspection and supervision agencies should actively coordinate and smooth daily communication and cooperation, utilize various mechanisms such as establishing work teams, regularly holding special joint meetings, organizing major supervision matters for discussion and judgment, joint supervision and inspection, reporting important situations, and regularly transferring clues to disciplinary and illegal issues, to achieve information resource sharing and audit review collaboration. From a practical perspective, audit transfer of problem clues has strong accuracy and a high success rate. In particular, it is necessary to improve the mechanism for transferring problem clues, standardize the transfer and investigation of audit discovered problem clues, and more effectively investigate and deal with major disciplinary and illegal issues. Strengthen complementary advantages and amplify the overlapping effect of supervision, integration, and integration. Discipline inspection and supervision agencies and audit agencies each have their own expertise and advantages, and the key is to showcase their strengths and answer the same questions together. We must deeply grasp the inherent logic of political supervision and economic supervision, persist in using a political perspective to analyze the problem clues discovered by audit supervision, and discover through analyzing economic problems and responsibilities