On April 11th, the National Internet Information Office of China released the "Management Measures for Generative Artificial Intelligence Services (Draft for Comments)" (referred to as the "Draft for Comments"), which is the first regulatory document in the field of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in China. On the same day, there was also news that the United States was considering measures to regulate artificial intelligence. According to the Wall Street Journal on the 11th, the United States Department of Commerce formally solicited public opinions on AI accountability measures on Tuesday, including whether new AI models with potential risks should pass the certification process before release. In addition, countries such as the UK, Italy, and Canada have also announced tightening regulatory policies for artificial intelligence. Close the Pandora's Box? The "Draft for Soliciting Opinions" contains a total of 21 measures, emphasizing the premise and necessity of security assessment and algorithm filing. The "Draft for Soliciting Opinions" clearly states that the term "generative artificial intelligence" in the measures refers to the technology of generating text, images, sound, video, code, and other content based on algorithms, models, and rules, and puts forward various requirements for generative artificial intelligence services, This includes "providing generative artificial intelligence products or services that comply with legal and regulatory requirements", "providers should be responsible for the legality of pre training data and optimized training data sources for generative artificial intelligence products", "requiring users to provide true identity information", and so on. Multiple experts stated in an interview with Global Times reporters on the 12th that the release of the "Draft for Soliciting Opinions" mainly clarifies the overall tone of standardizing and then developing generative artificial intelligence, with the aim of improving the application environment of generative artificial intelligence and creating conditions for its application in China. In recent times, generative artificial intelligence technology has sparked a new wave of productivity innovation, and major technology companies around the world are vying to expand their presence. However, while the popularity of artificial intelligence is spreading, the conceptual confusion and security issues it generates also raise many concerns. On April 3rd, American law professor Terry wrote in USA Today that he received an email informing him that someone had found him inexplicably on the list of sexual harassment students provided by the tool while testing generative artificial intelligence; Reuters reported on the 5th that the Sheriff of Hepburn County, Australia, was mistakenly listed as the "perpetrator" of a foreign bribery scandal in a subsidiary of the Reserve Bank of Australia by generative AI... Many people said that AI had opened the "Pandora's Box" and called on the government to introduce regulatory measures. In addition to China and the United States, countries such as the UK, Italy, Canada, France, and Spain have also begun to take action. According to the Financial Times, the UK government released its first white paper on artificial intelligence in March, outlining five principles of AI governance. In addition, according to Reuters, at the end of March, the Italian government announced a ban on the use of an artificial intelligence chat robot and restricted related companies from processing Italian user information data, while also filing an investigation into its privacy and security issues. On April 4th, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation reported that the federal privacy regulatory agency in Canada has announced an investigation into OpenAI, a US artificial intelligence research company, for allegedly "collecting, using, and disclosing personal information without consent. With multiple countries