The reporter learned that in January 2020, the Supreme Court of Public Prosecutions issued the "Main Evaluation Indicators for Case Quality of Procuratorial Organs" for the first time, and revised it for the first time in October 2021. The "Evaluation Indicators" issued in this revision has been further simplified to 46 items, covering the main types of cases, main case handling activities, main litigation processes, and all procuratorial supervision methods such as case filing supervision, direct acceptance of investigation cases, protest, corrective opinions, procuratorial suggestions, and public interest litigation. It is understood that this indicator revision takes "handling every case with high quality and efficiency" as the basic value pursuit, highlighting the system concept and system thinking, and presents four major characteristics: first, more emphasis on comprehensive evaluation. Make a good plan of "quality with quantity" and "quantity with quality". While paying more attention to quality, pay attention to having a reasonable quantity as the basis, reflecting the organic unity of the "three effects" of supervision and case handling composed of "strength", a certain amount ", and more important" quality ". Second, pay more attention to overall evaluation. Based on the basic functions of legal supervision, focus on the main responsibilities and businesses, pay attention to the evaluation of the main businesses and key businesses of the procuratorial organ, and reflect the main contradictions in the procuratorial business and the main aspects of the contradictions in the main links. Third, pay more attention to portfolio evaluation. Pay attention to the coordination and correlation between indicators, and develop from single and isolated indicators to related and collaborative indicators. Fourth, pay more attention to performance evaluation. Guide prosecutors to accurately grasp the value orientation behind the evaluation indicators, eliminate the mechanical evaluation methods of "indicator based" and "data based", scientifically use the main evaluation indicators of case quality, and promote better quality and efficiency in supervising and handling cases. In procuratorial practice, how to scientifically apply the Evaluation Indicators and effectively play the role of "baton" and "vane" guiding high-quality procuratorial performance? The person in charge of the Supreme Prosecution Case Management Office stated that the implementation of the "Evaluation Indicators" should be regarded as a fundamental and overall event, focusing on guiding prosecutors to fully understand the significance of the "Evaluation Indicators", accurately grasp the contents and specific meanings, correctly understand the application, focus on improving the quality and efficiency of supervision and case handling, and avoid the formation of unhealthy "competition for the first" and "fear of the second". We should strengthen the quality verification of indicator data and have zero tolerance for "anti management" reflected in the operation of indicators. In addition, by continuously optimizing the procuratorial business application system, fully integrating evaluation indicators and "business guidance data" and "statistical data" to guide the business, and taking "comprehensive, full staff, full-time" and "practical, accurate, and good use" as the guidance, we will strengthen the management of "cases" and "people", and take multiple measures to truly achieve scientific evaluation indicators, scientific indicator realization forms, and scientific assessment application effects. (Liao Xinshe)