Recently, the Intermediate People's Court of Sanya City, Hainan Province fined a construction engineering company in Hainan Province (hereinafter referred to as the Construction Company) 300000 yuan, cracking down on and warning against the act of forging and providing false important evidence in civil litigation. It is reported that in the case of property damage compensation dispute between the plaintiff Construction Company and the defendants Wu and Wang, the Construction Company provided evidence in the first instance that it had paid a contract and transfer transaction amount of 1.81 million yuan in one-year rent, as a demand for Wu and Wang to compensate for the corresponding property damage caused to them. The first instance court accepted the evidence and made a civil judgment based on it. Wu and Wang appealed to the Sanya Intermediate People's Court against the first instance judgment. After trial, the Sanya Intermediate People's Court found that the construction company transferred a total of 1.81 million yuan in four installments to a certain mechanical engineering company in Hainan (hereinafter referred to as the Machinery Company) after filing a lawsuit in the first instance. After receiving the payment, the mechanical company immediately transferred four payments totaling over 1.62 million yuan to the major shareholder company of the construction company, all of which were marked with the words "returned". The court believes that after the mechanical company returned more than 1.62 million yuan to the major shareholder of the construction company, the remaining 180000 yuan should be regarded as the real rent paid by the construction company, that is, the rental loss caused by the construction company's excavator being detained by Wu and Wang. The construction company provided the first instance court with a false contract and corresponding transfer transaction amount of 1.81 million yuan in paid one-year rent, and thus sued for a rental loss of over 1.0849 million yuan during the period of excavator detention, in order to seek more benefits. The construction company forged important evidence and did not truthfully state the facts of the case, seriously hindering the trial of the case by the people's court, resulting in the case being overturned by the Sanya Intermediate People's Court in the second instance. Sanya Intermediate People's Court imposed a fine of 300000 yuan on the construction company in accordance with the law. (New Society)