Another internet celebrity has' overturned '. A well-known internet celebrity insulted and posted the user's ID and profile picture in the live broadcast room just because of a single "dislike", causing a public uproar. Subsequently, the internet celebrity released a video apologizing, but the repeated "I'm sorry" couldn't stop netizens who didn't buy it or the plummeting number of fans. More people pointed out that your apology is a profound reflection of your mistake, or is it to save the Internet? After the curse storm, "Empty Diary" lost over two million followers. The screenshot of the short video platform cursed netizens in the webcast room: the cancer and early reincarnation events resulted from a topic: how to disenchant Internet bloggers? A few days ago, a blogger named "Happy Hulusi" released a video about roast about the current status of online celebrity live broadcast. Netizen 'Momo' expressed his feelings and commented below the video: 'I don't like the internet celebrity' Empty Diary '.'. Who is an empty diary? A short video platform blogger, who has more than 5 million fans, has won the audience's favor by setting attributes such as "witty words", "Internet mouth", "three views" and others. Previously, "Empty Diary" had released a video stating that it hated bullies the most. I saw a negative review for 'momo' in the video screenshot. 'Empty Diary' became uneasy and replied, 'I don't like you either,' while also blacklisting the other person. The "momo" argument was fruitless and turned to other social platforms to roast about it. Coincidentally, this roast post was brushed by "Empty Diary". In front of thousands of people in the live broadcast room, he publicly released the ID and profile picture of "momo", accompanied by comments such as "if you are sick, you should be reincarnated quickly" and "if you have cancer", launching personal attacks on him. In the live broadcast room, 'Empty Diary' cursed netizens. A screenshot of a live stream saying 'I don't like it' sparked a frenzy of online violence. After the incident escalated, the fans of "Empty Diary" plummeted by one million overnight. As of the time of publication, its fan base was only 3.41 million, with a loss of two million followers, and related discussions were rampant. Everyone must like an empty diary, otherwise they will be exposed to online bullying Cancer should not be your tool for cursing people Works determine whether internet celebrities can gain followers, while character determines whether fans can be retained It's ironic that he once said he would resist bullying, but now he has become a bully After the collapse of the entire platform, "Empty Diary" released a video apology, admitting that the behavior of attacking and insulting Ms. "Momo" in the live broadcast room was true. In everyone's mind, I have always been an outgoing and just boy. This incident is beyond reproach and has indeed disappointed everyone... In the future, I will work hard to improve my personal qualities, regulate my words and deeds, and strive to become a positive and energetic boy again. "" Empty Diary "posted a video apology. As soon as the screenshot of the video apologizes, most netizens did not buy it. Some people dug up the previous statement of "Empty Diary", "What I hate the most is bullies", questioning his inconsistency in words and actions; Many cancer patients and their families have also raised concerns that the blogger cursed others with the disease, seriously hurting the emotions of cancer patients. Meanwhile, some netizens hold opposing views: the incident was caused by the unfriendly remarks of "Momo", do public figures not have the right to retaliate? Lawyer interpretation: "Empty Diary" suspected of infringing on username reputation rights. "The upcoming" Regulations on the Governance of Cyberbullying Information "(hereinafter referred to as the" Regulations on the Governance of Cyberbullying Information "), which will be implemented on August 1, 2024, have made a clear definition of cyberbullying information." Zhu Xiaoyan, a lawyer from Beijing Daozhang Law Firm, told reporters that the internet celebrity publicly disclosed the ID information of user "Momo" in front of thousands of people in the live broadcast room and made insulting and abusive remarks such as "if you have a brain disease", "if you have a disease, you should give birth quickly", "if you have cancer", etc. Her behavior is suspected of infringing on the reputation rights of the real name registrant of user "Momo". And in situations where there are a large number of people in the live broadcast room and the impact is significant, it may trigger administrative and criminal liability. Notice from the State Administration of Radio and Television and the Ministry of Culture and Tourism on Issuing the Code of Conduct for Online Anchors. In addition, Zhu Xiaoyan pointed out that the "Code of Conduct for Online Anchors" issued by the State Administration of Radio, Television and the Ministry of Culture and Tourism has clear requirements for the prohibition of behaviors of online anchors, such as "insulting, defaming others or spreading other people's privacy, infringing on the legitimate rights and interests of others", "guiding users to engage in vulgar interactions, organizing and inciting fans to tear and insult each other, pulling and trampling, inciting wars, spreading rumors and attacks, and committing online violence". If the above-mentioned prohibited behaviors are implemented, it may be suspected of being illegal. Regarding the comments of "momo", Zhu Xiaoyan believes that the subjective expression of "dislike" towards the internet celebrity by the user "momo" generally does not constitute infringement, let alone online violence against the internet celebrity. But if the user "momo" not only expresses subjectively, but also extends to publish insulting or defamatory remarks, it may be suspected of infringement, concentrated publication, or other serious circumstances, and may also constitute online violence. In addition, regarding the comments made by the internet celebrity in the live broadcast room, such as "have cancer", Zhu Xiaoyan stated that the curse comments of the internet celebrity may harm patients and their families who unfortunately suffer from cancer, which violates public order, good customs, and socialist core values, and can be morally condemned. It is also suspected of violating the relevant regulations of the "Code of Conduct for Online Anchors" and other relevant departments on online broadcasters. In recent years, there have been more and more internet celebrities who have gained popularity through their sharp tongue and criticism of fans. How will the impact of public figures' words and actions on society be legally considered compared to ordinary netizens? Due to their identity, public figures are easily the focus of public attention and have the characteristic of attracting public opinion, which makes society's comments on them comprehensive, multi-dimensional, in-depth, and persistent. They also have more opportunities to clarify relevant reports or comments through the media. Zhu Xiaoyan emphasized that public figures should be more cautious in their words and actions when making public statements, abide by China's laws and regulations, and not break through the moral bottom line. At the same time, in judicial practice, it is generally recognized that public figures have a higher obligation to tolerate criticism from the public. China News Service Review: Using illness as a weapon to attack others is so cold-blooded! The 'Empty Diary' incident once again exposed the ugly face of online violence. A sentence of 'dislike' is actually met with the curse of 'getting cancer', which is not only an insult to individuals, but also a trampling on public rationality. As public figures, internet celebrities should have become disseminators of positive social energy, rather than creators of negative emotions. The 'Empty Diary' has over five million fans. When choosing to respond to evaluations in the most extreme and vicious way, he completely ignored the social responsibility and moral bottom line that a public figure should have, turning cyberspace into a lawless' lawless place '. Screenshot of comments from netizens. The use of illness as a weapon to attack others on Weibo is so absurd and cold-blooded. Not only does it belittle the dignity and resistance value of patients, sprinkle salt on the wounds of patients and their families, but it also misleads the public to view illness as a frivolous topic, seriously distorting social cognition. This is not only an extreme disregard for the dignity of life, but also a lack of politeness and empathy. The words and actions of public figures should be subject to both moral and legal constraints. A simple 'I'm sorry' cannot conceal the severity of their behavior. True repentance is not just a verbal apology, but also a change in action. Re evaluate one's own words and actions, learn to respect others, in order to regain public trust. This rollover event undoubtedly sounded the alarm bell for the entire Internet. The internet is not a lawless place, and everyone must abide by laws, regulations, and ethical standards. The words and actions of public figures are not only related to personal image and reputation, but also to social atmosphere and direction. Please do not have an empty mind in the face of emotions and traffic. Always remember your social responsibility and moral mission, and be cautious in your words and actions. (New Society)