In order to implement the provisions of the newly revised Administrative Reconsideration Law, refine and standardize the procedures for listening to opinions and hearings, further strengthen the mediation work of administrative reconsideration, improve the quality and efficiency of administrative reconsideration work, and better protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons, and other organizations, the Ministry of Justice recently issued three administrative normative documents: "Measures for Listening to Opinions in the Ordinary Procedure of Administrative Reconsideration", "Measures for Hearing in the Ordinary Procedure of Administrative Reconsideration", and "Guiding Opinions on Further Strengthening the Mediation Work of Administrative Reconsideration to Promote the Substantive Resolution of Administrative Disputes". The Measures for Hearing Opinions in the Ordinary Procedure of Administrative Reconsideration and the Measures for Hearing Opinions in the Ordinary Procedure of Administrative Reconsideration clearly define six categories of contents that focus on hearing opinions, five situations in which opinions cannot be heard due to the reasons of the parties and six situations in which hearings should be held, specify the specific requirements for hearing opinions in person, by telephone, on the Internet and other ways, as well as the specific process of the hearing, and specify the circumstances and legal effect of the suspension of the hearing, and the online video hearing. The Guiding Opinions on Further Strengthening Administrative Reconsideration and Mediation Work to Promote Substantive Resolution of Administrative Disputes adhere to and develop the "Fengqiao Experience" of the new era, focus on promoting substantive resolution of administrative disputes, and deepen the governance of the source of administrative disputes. This opinion clarifies the need to further expand the scope of administrative reconsideration mediation, increase the intensity of administrative reconsideration mediation work, achieve full coverage of all types of administrative reconsideration cases through administrative reconsideration mediation, and run through the entire process before, during, and after the case. It also establishes and improves various mechanisms for administrative reconsideration mediation work, strengthens the guarantee of administrative reconsideration mediation work, comprehensively improves the ability of administrative reconsideration mediation, and resolves more administrative disputes at the grassroots level, in the initial stage, and in administrative procedures. (Lai Xin She)