The accelerated iteration of artificial intelligence technology is profoundly changing human production and life, and has a broad and profound impact on the development of human civilization and social progress. However, technological progress is often a double-edged sword. While new forms and products of artificial intelligence emerge endlessly, the uncertainty of the transformation and application of artificial intelligence technology has brought impacts on network security, social employment, legal ethics, and many risks and challenges to national politics, economy, and social security. How to ensure that artificial intelligence always develops according to the preset goals of serving humanity is becoming a common concern in the international community today. At present, artificial intelligence is still in a stage of rapid development, but due to the inherent fragility of its technology and the backwardness of regulatory systems behind technological development and other objective factors, countries have not yet formed a unified understanding of artificial intelligence risk governance, resulting in the dilemma of new problems emerging rapidly and governance rules lacking. To be frank, while people are enjoying the efficiency and convenience of artificial intelligence technology, the potential legal, ethical, and other risks it brings are also becoming increasingly prominent. The author has been engaged in judicial work for a long time, and this article focuses on exploring how to balance the innovation and development of the artificial intelligence industry with legal risk prevention. In November 2023, the first Global Artificial Intelligence Security Summit was held in the UK and released the Bletchley Declaration, which reached a consensus on the collaborative and security centric aspects of artificial intelligence, ensuring that the world moves towards a future where artificial intelligence is safe and ethically serving humanity. Major countries around the world are actively promoting the innovative development and application of artificial intelligence, while also vigorously strengthening forward-looking research and proactive prevention of security risks, striving to seize the opportunity and win the initiative in the new wave of artificial intelligence development. As recently passed by the European Parliament, the draft authorization for the Artificial Intelligence Act aims to promote Europe's innovation capabilities in the field of artificial intelligence, while supporting the development and adoption of ethical and trustworthy artificial intelligence throughout the EU economy. The United States emphasizes the scientific and flexible nature of regulation through the "Guidelines for the Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Applications", and attaches importance to creating a "safe harbor" and regulatory exemptions for artificial intelligence applications. At present, how to effectively control artificial intelligence security risks is still in the exploratory stage. In the future, China still needs to further carry out forward-looking research and strategic layout of security management work, participate in and promote the international rule formulation of artificial intelligence risk governance with a pragmatic and prudent attitude, especially encourage the active participation of frontline enterprises and organizations in the industry, and enhance the international discourse power of China's artificial intelligence security and governance plans. Strengthening risk management in artificial intelligence requires attention to the formulation of standards. Once a key technology that effectively combines with technical standards occupies a certain industry or field, it is easy to gain market initiative. Establishing a leadership position in technical standards is a key link for enterprises to grow and strengthen. For many years, some developed countries have relied on innovation driven strategies and maintained their position as an economic and technological powerhouse through the combined efforts of standard strategies, patent strategies, and new industry cluster strategies. Practice has proven that companies that set standards have a competitive advantage. Whoever is absent from standard setting will be in a passive position in future competition. Currently, carbon reduction technologies, next-generation mobile communication, artificial intelligence, quantum computing