Liu Lei, a National People's Congress representative, was most impressed by the 2024 Work Report of the Supreme People's Procuratorate on the case of promoting socialist core values and promoting the construction of a rule of law society in the performance of duties and handling cases. The most impressive case was the public interest lawsuit against counterfeit and inferior fire extinguishers. This case is related to her proposal on incorporating the maintenance of socialist core values into the new field of public interest litigation submitted at the National People's Congress and Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference three years ago. Seeing that her suggestions continued to blossom and bear fruit, Liu Lei felt a sense of gain, and combined with the work of the E-commerce Development Center, she further suggested providing legal supervision and protection for promoting a culture of integrity. To handle the representative's suggestions well, we should do our best to achieve success and implement them, and effectively integrate the values of integrity into the high-quality and efficient handling of public interest litigation in procuratorial work. Make excellent traditional Chinese culture an important source of cultivating socialist core values. In accordance with the deployment of the report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China on strengthening the legal supervision of procuratorial organs and improving the public interest litigation system, and in accordance with the requirements of the "Opinions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Strengthening the Legal Supervision of Procuratorial Organs in the New Era" on "integrating socialist core values into legal supervision, promoting strict law enforcement, fair judiciary, regulating social behavior, and leading social trends", Public interest litigation in procuratorial work should be based on the legal field, coordinate the use of measures such as serving green finance, protecting consumer rights, and maintaining public safety, and firmly adhere to the bottom line of integrity. The bottom line of serving green finance is to prevent environmental impact assessment and environmental monitoring data from being falsified, and to prevent special funds for preferential policies and support measures such as national finance and taxation, finance, subsidies, and subsidies from being defrauded or embezzled. The Eleventh Amendment to the Criminal Law has been specifically revised to address the crime of providing false proof documents. The procuratorial organs can, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Environmental Protection Law, handle criminal civil public interest litigation cases in accordance with the law against intermediary organization personnel who provide false environmental impact assessments and other proof documents in major projects or projects involving public safety, causing particularly significant losses to public property, national and people's interests, and trace government regulatory responsibilities and corporate subject responsibilities to promote systematic governance. For example, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, in conjunction with the Ministry of Public Security and the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, carried out a special campaign to crack down on third-party environmental protection service agencies engaging in fraud, and maintained a high-pressure crackdown on crimes of automatic monitoring data fraud and environmental pollution committed by key polluting units. The Shandong Jinhua case, jointly supervised by three departments, has prompted ecological and environmental departments in more than ten provinces to revoke false environmental impact assessment documents, providing a basis for determining direct economic losses. In a typical case jointly released by three departments, Shenmou, Changshu City, Jiangsu Province