The report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China proposes to accelerate the construction of a fair, efficient, and authoritative socialist judicial system, and strive to make the people feel fairness and justice in every judicial case. The Intermediate People's Court of Siping City, Jilin Province, closely centering on the work theme of "fairness and efficiency", focuses on the main responsibility, serves the overall situation of development, demonstrates the people's court's responsibility with active justice, and promotes the high-quality development of court work in the new era by comprehensively improving the quality of cases. It strives to promote the modernization of the trial system and trial capacity, and serves to guarantee Chinese path to modernization. 1、 Deeply understanding the importance of comprehensively improving the quality of cases, as the lifeline of trial execution work, case quality is not only the first standard for the people to feel the judicial fairness of the people's court, but also an important manifestation of allowing the people to feel fairness and justice in every judicial case, and also a political sentiment of serving the people in the judiciary. Fair justice is the last line of defense to maintain social fairness and justice. The quality of case trial is related to the vital interests of every party involved. For a judge, each case is just one of many cases, but for the parties involved, it is the only one. Therefore, regardless of the circumstances, the people's court's grasp of the quality of the case is crucial. Only by putting justice for the people and implementing fair justice in practice can we continuously enhance the judicial credibility of the people's courts and enhance their sense of judicial gain and satisfaction. The people's courts not only uphold social fairness and justice through judicial judgments, but also undertake a large number of social governance tasks, playing an important role in actively promoting the modernization of the social governance system and governance capacity. Practice has proven that flaws and deficiencies in the quality of cases are important factors that trigger complaints and petitions. Only by regulating judicial behavior and improving the quality of case handling can we fundamentally alleviate the pressure of litigation related petitions, curb the occurrence of litigation related petitions from the source, and better maintain social order and promote social harmony and stability. 2、 For a period of time, with the efforts of various levels and departments, the people's courts have been striving to make the people feel fairness and justice in every judicial case, adhering to active justice, and steadily improving the quality of cases. However, they also face some new problems and challenges. Some judges lack sufficient professional knowledge reserves and law enforcement and case handling abilities; Some judges only focus on the legality of handling cases and ignore the temperature of handling cases; Some judges lack a broad perspective in their work, only seeing the surface data of case handling indicators and failing to see the judicial purpose for the people behind the indicators; Some judges blindly pursue the completion rate and hastily close cases without conducting a comprehensive and detailed review, which raises reasonable doubts about the fairness of the judgment results among the parties. This not only intensifies their emotions, reduces judicial credibility, but also increases the burden of public litigation. 3、 The practical path to comprehensively improve the quality of cases is the lifeline of judicial handling, the barometer of judicial fairness, and the prerequisite for pursuing efficiency and effectiveness in case handling. In the new situation, we conscientiously implement the new deployment and requirements of judicial reform, effectively adapt to the development needs of judicial trial work in the new era, take multiple measures and make precise efforts to comprehensively improve the quality and efficiency of case handling. Firmly establish bottom line thinking. Judicial practice