The suggestions of the National People's Congress representatives should be continuously followed up, not limited to the matter itself, but should have a global perspective. In the process of implementing the representatives' suggestions, problems should be identified, identified, and solved. "How to implement the suggestions of the National People's Congress representatives, said Zhang Jian, Prosecutor General of the Guangzhou Procuratorate in Guangdong Province. As one of the first national demonstration zones for intellectual property protection in China, Guangzhou regards intellectual property protection as an important lever for optimizing the business environment. In April this year, Li Xuefeng, a representative of the Guangzhou Municipal People's Congress, and others jointly submitted a proposal on strengthening intellectual property protection, addressing the difficulties of intellectual property protection in Guangzhou, such as the lack of coordination between administrative law enforcement and judicial protection of intellectual property. The Guangzhou procuratorial organs are only one of the units implementing this representative's suggestion, but they attach great importance to it. This suggestion provides a starting point for the Guangzhou procuratorial organs to focus on solving the pain points and difficulties in current intellectual property protection from the perspective of entrepreneurs, "said the relevant person in charge of the court. Shortly after the introduction of guidelines for handling cases and the submission of suggestions by representatives of unified evidence standards, the Guangzhou Municipal Procuratorate held a symposium on intellectual property protection, inviting representatives of 12 enterprises including Guangzhou Automobile Group, Guangzhou Shipbuilding International, Huawei Group, Xiyin Company, Procter&Gamble Company, and some representatives of the People's Congress to participate and solicit opinions and suggestions. At the meeting, Hu Guoxiong, a representative of the Guangzhou Municipal People's Congress, said that protecting intellectual property rights is multidimensional, and many enterprises have many difficulties in protecting their own intellectual property rights. He hopes that relevant departments can provide more detailed guidance on protecting rights and improve the quality and efficiency of case handling. Other attendees provided opinions and suggestions on the identification of trade secrets, the establishment of rights protection mechanisms, cross-border evidence collection, the protection of cutting-edge artificial intelligence technologies, and the creation of a liaison platform for inspection and enterprise. After conducting research on criminal cases involving intellectual property rights throughout the city, the Guangzhou procuratorial organs found that there is a problem of inconsistent standards for grasping evidence. To this end, the procuratorial and investigative organs held a joint meeting to jointly study the evidence standards for intellectual property crime cases, and issued the "Guangzhou Guidelines for the Collection and Review of Evidence in Intellectual Property Crime Cases (Trial)", providing guidance on the acceptance, review, arrest, review and prosecution of intellectual property criminal cases throughout the city, as well as case circulation and work connection. The introduction of the "Guidelines" has achieved specialization in handling intellectual property criminal cases, standardization of evidence, and unification of judgments, optimizing the legal business environment. "Li Xuedong, Deputy Prosecutor General of Guangzhou Procuratorate, introduced. The upgrading of work mechanisms, smoother connection of execution, and improved connection between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice are issues of concern to representatives of the National People's Congress and entrepreneurs. A representative of the National People's Congress mentioned that infringers who do not need to be held criminally responsible or exempted from criminal punishment according to law should be promptly transferred to the department responsible for intellectual property supervision for handling. As early as two years ago, the Guangzhou Procuratorate, the Municipal Public Security Bureau, and the Market Supervision and Administration Bureau jointly signed the "Opinions on Strengthening and Improving the Work Mechanism for the Connection of Intellectual Property Administrative Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice in Guangzhou". The Baiyun District Procuratorate led multiple units to jointly issue the "Work Regulations for the Connection of Intellectual Property Administrative Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice". In October 2022, the Huangpu District Procuratorate, in conjunction with the District Intellectual Property Office, based on the characteristics and situation of intellectual property crimes investigated and dealt with in the district,