Chinese Online has recently released the "Chinese Happy Model", a large-scale model for creating 10000 characters. It is said to provide full cycle creative assistance from story conception, plot arrangement, character dialogue, and illustration production. It can generate 10000 characters with one click, write a novel with one image, and read 1 million words at a time. A few months ago, Yuewen Group released its first tool to assist writers in creating, "Yuewen Mian Bi," and an application based on this big model, "Writer Assistant Mian Bi Edition," positioned as a tool to assist writers in creating. Perhaps the time is too short, at least the Android system has not seen the application of the "Chinese Xiaoyao" big model yet. The only application related to reading articles is the "Writer Assistant", which is still a highly templated writing and publishing application, equivalent to linking writing tools and publishing spaces, without its "clever version". In the second half of the year, the large-scale artificial intelligence model in China will be launched, and the domestic intellectual community will gradually awaken from the awe of AI. Many commentators have pointed out the mediocrity of AI generated text. Can specialized online article creation models bring about changes? A more noteworthy issue than the textual level is whether the creative model can implement the concept of serving writers and protecting literary originality. Protecting people's original creativity is an inherent part of AI ethics, and it will continue to be strengthened in the future in the adjustment between people and AI. The Hollywood screenwriter strike has just ended after 148 days, and the agreement reached with the management includes "materials generated by artificial intelligence cannot be considered as original materials, and the authorship and originality of screenwriters cannot be compromised by the intervention of artificial intelligence". At the same time, the writers' union also made a prescriptive proposal that the writers' union has the right to prohibit production companies from using the materials created by the writers for training artificial intelligence, which means strictly protecting the style of the original author from AI imitation. However, the above defensive policies are considered "high-level concerns" based on concerns about AI generation capabilities and advancement speed. If the so-called online text generation is just a concept based on integrating existing databases, then it should not worry writers about being replaced by realism at present. In terms of protecting creativity, a more practical issue is how to not turn the tools that assist writers into templates for disciplining writers, and how to help writers break free from mechanization rather than falling into a higher level of mechanization. The so-called high-order mechanization refers to seemingly tools that are actually fixed templates and path training. Entering the auxiliary writing page, first divide the "male frequency" and "female frequency" articles, otherwise you cannot proceed to the next item. Entering the category division again, given several items such as science fiction, fantasy, and urban, one cannot enter the next item without selecting them. Each step is a multiple-choice question with limited answers, and some of these answers reinforce stereotypical literary concepts, while others are purely convenient to manage using template order. Of course, the author community can write without such tools, but this writing order is consistent with the order of online media push, and without strong recommendations, it is basically like fighting the street - this has become the consensus of many online writers. In 2022, the cumulative number of Chinese online literary writers exceeded 22.78 million. How many people can break free from this template order? Will the application of AI further unleash the creativity behind online articles, or will it use feeding methods