Recently, the Beijing Internet Court held a press conference to release judicial recommendations and five typical judicial recommendations. According to reports, since its establishment, the Beijing Internet Court has issued 23 judicial suggestions to relevant government agencies, enterprises and institutions, industry associations, etc., and received 17 replies, with a response rate of 74%. Internet platforms account for the vast majority of sending units, with issues concentrated on internal normative issues such as platform supervision, institutional mechanisms, format clauses, and technical updates. In addition to providing judicial recommendations for specific issues reflected in individual cases, the court also provides judicial recommendations for general, systematic, and emerging issues discovered during the trial process, promoting the active and stable resolution of disputes in a mass and classified manner. The Beijing Internet Court adheres to the line of prioritizing 'quality' rather than 'quantity' in the high-quality judicial advice project, effectively turning the 'soft supervision' of judicial advice into a 'hard means'. Zhao Ruigang, a member of the party group and vice president of the court, stated that in the judicial advice work, the court adheres to the equal importance of case trials and industry governance, pre communication and post feedback, case analysis and case guidance, and forms a governance synergy through multi-directional interaction, Boost the standardized development of the platform economy and promote the resolution of conflicts and disputes at the source. Our judicial advice has received high attention from the recommended units, especially the administrative regulatory authorities, with a response rate of 100%. However, the response rate and rectification effectiveness of some industry associations and platform enterprises need to be further improved. "Zhao Ruigang introduced that the judicial advice work of our hospital strictly controls the issuance, quality, and effectiveness. While providing suggestions for internet enterprises to prevent legal risks and references for administrative regulatory authorities to make scientific decisions, Strengthen investigation and research, transform the content of judicial advice into measures to serve the high-quality development of the digital economy and the high-quality construction of the Beijing International Science and Technology Innovation Center, and maximize the effectiveness of judicial advice work. Next, the Beijing Internet Court will build a "1+1+1+N" full chain governance model, which will use typical cases related to the internet as a starting point to produce a "targeted" judicial proposal, integrate it into a "penetrating" comprehensive governance plan, establish and improve a "normalized" joint research and co governance sharing mechanism, solve N potential disputes, and provide high-quality judicial advice to serve the overall situation and the people's justice. (New News Agency)