I have a high school classmate who works at a publishing house, mainly engaged in textbook publishing. He told me a research result: "In the next decade, there will be a 40% decrease in the number of children enrolled compared to now. They have concerns about the industry's decline, but I am a bit overjoyed - there is no need to buy a school district house, and there is no problem with "large class size". In the future, it will be great for children to have two seats for each person when they go to school! My personal position is still not high enough to see clearly. My daughter is going to primary school this year, and seeing this news before registering for primary school gave me a big bang: due to the transmission effects of the "comprehensive two child" policy seven years ago, many parts of the country have experienced peak primary school enrollment this year. In fact, there have been signs of "running away" among the parents of the daughter's class for a long time: since the beginning of the senior class, some children have already gone out to attend the preschool transition class instead of attending kindergarten; The kindergarten offers a transition course between kindergarten and primary school, with daily assignments for writing and pinyin. Of course, the topics discussed by parents also revolve around attending school. Which district to go to for school, what are the teaching characteristics of which district, what is the probability of lottery for which private school, and the high and low prices of housing in each district... After primary school registration started, the way parents greet each other has also changed. It used to be similar to "eating" and asking each other "sent to school", but now we all gather together to chat for a while, The topics are nothing more than "Did you apply for your name?" "The registration network is really slow." "Which school did you apply to?" "Can you find a reason to be one year late for school?" and so on. This year is undoubtedly the "big year" for primary school enrollment. In such an environment, amidst various choices, how can there be no anxiety? How should we teach the problem of water discharge from water pipes in mathematics? "Recently, I talked to a friend working in educational management about this issue. This problem has not only troubled many students for a long time, but also many adults will make fun of it: "It's not a waste of water to let water in and out." My friend pointed me out that this is because we did not combine application teaching, and the Water dispenser just uses this principle! Looking at ourselves, after more than ten years of studying, how much knowledge we still remember and can use in school may be the answer to the majority of people's sentence 'I have returned it to the teacher'. This is related to our teaching model, as well as whether we were truly interested in our studies and took the initiative to learn back then. For this reason, my friend has compiled two books with the aim of exploring how teachers can encourage students to learn and actively learn in their daily lives. On the contrary, our current primary and secondary education may also be running too fast to achieve its goals. Many parents around me unanimously believe that "children are too mischievous, choosing a school with strict teaching may make them excel academically. And we clearly know that some so-called "strict teaching" schools are nothing more than "increasing quantity without improving quality" and "teaching in advance". Is this really beneficial for children's growth? It's hard to say. Whether it is early teaching or increasing the number of repeated mechanical exercises, it may weaken students' interest in learning and enthusiasm for active learning. Faced with such an environment, it is more necessary to have less anxiety and more rationality. After my daughter attends the kindergarten class, I usually let her play outside for a little while after school