The village branch secretary has transformed from a leader to a "big mouse", misappropriating nearly 300 million yuan of collective funds... Recently, the website of the Sichuan Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision released an analysis of Li Zhiyong, former secretary of the Party General Branch and director of the village committee in Hanboling Village, Wan'an Street, Tianfu New Area, Sichuan, who violated discipline and violated the law. As the leader of the village's development, 47 year old Li Zhiyong was supposed to shoulder the heavy burden and strive for success, but he was imprisoned for receiving red envelope gifts, accepting bribes, and misappropriating funds. The "Double Sided Life" of the capable village branch warns party members and cadres that being able but not honest will inevitably lead to disasters, and clean work is the essence of a public servant. From the case analysis, Li Zhiyong was also full of enthusiasm and ambition, and had made great achievements in the vast countryside. In 1994, Li Zhiyong, who graduated from university, returned to work in rural areas and led everyone to work hard. He gradually grew into the youngest village party branch secretary in the local area and developed a poor village into a wealthy one. However, with the rapid development of his rural area, the leader's thinking is also changing. He mistakenly believes that the changes in the village are all due to his own efforts, and his initial intention to seek benefits for the people gradually becomes his personal desire to seek wealth for himself. Unable to resist the praise of "hunting around", he took his first red envelope and then accepted bribes without hesitation; Unable to control their inner desires, they misappropriated the collective funds of the village to purchase financial products... The capable village branch gradually forgot their original intentions and disregarded discipline and law, and went further and further astray. From dedicating oneself to rural construction with a sense of nostalgia, to amassing wealth recklessly due to imbalanced mentality; Li Zhiyong's transformation from a capable village cadre to a corrupt and deeply misguided individual is a true portrayal of "having more talent but less virtue". In recent years, there have been many cases of disciplinary and illegal violations investigated and dealt with, including talented individuals like Li Zhiyong who are corrupt officials. Some cadres have talent but no virtue, and are capable of doing things but not clean; Some are self inflating, power capricious, and unable to figure out "who I am, for whom, and who I rely on"... Their political achievements and "success" stories are different, but their "falling horse" trajectory is the same: arrogant, arbitrary, and difficult to fill their desires... This once again indicates that many cadres have problems because they do not cultivate moral character or speak of political morality. To have talent, one must have morality, and to be able to work, one must be clean. For party members, cadres, and public officials, this virtue is the great virtue of ideals and beliefs, the public virtue of governing for the people, and the private virtue of self-discipline. A person can only use their great virtues, abide by public virtues, and be strict with personal virtues. If we do not uphold morality, cultivate morality, and practice morality, no matter how capable and capable we are, we will find it difficult to become a good cadre trusted by the Party and the people. Party members and cadres should take advanced models as the benchmark, cultivate their moral character, solidify their roots, and cultivate their talents. They should always cultivate their moral character, engage in politics with morality, and establish their careers with morality. Promoting clean work among party members and cadres not only relies on personal self-discipline and moral cultivation, but also strengthens heteronomy and supervision. As the top leader of the village, Li Zhiyong vigorously engages in "one talk" and does not listen to opinions or be supervised, reflecting the weak supervision force at the grassroots level and the difficulty of social supervision by acquaintances. We need to strengthen grassroots supervision, innovate supervision methods, solve supervision problems, and strengthen the supervision and management of village cadres, especially "shoulder to shoulder" personnel. We need to unblock channels for public supervision, improve grassroots supervision networks, leverage the role of public supervision, and promote the standardization and precision of village level matters