At the national teleconference on learning and implementing the spirit of the National People's Congress and the National People's Congress, the President of the Supreme People's Court, Zhang Jun, emphasized the need to promote innovation driven development and serve technology for self-reliance and self-improvement. In the new era and new journey, the people's court must accurately grasp the specific requirements of "strengthening the legal protection of intellectual property rights" put forward in the report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, give full play to the role of intellectual property trial function, and strive to drive development with high-quality judicial service innovation. Always cherish the concept of 'the greatness of the country' and provide better services to ensure high-quality development. Innovation is the primary driving force behind development, and protecting innovation is the first step in serving high-quality development. We should focus on the development needs of the real economy and the manufacturing industry, properly hear high-tech cases involving integrated circuits, new energy vehicles, artificial intelligence, gene technology and other high-tech cases, increase the judicial protection of key core technologies and intellectual property rights in key domain knowledge of the "choke", and help high-level science and technology self-reliance. We should focus on the requirement of "ensuring that the Chinese people's livelihood is firmly in our hands", try new plant variety cases in accordance with the law, resolutely safeguard national seed source security, and actively assist in the revitalization of the seed industry. We should strengthen the judicial protection of copyright, promote the creative transformation and innovative development of excellent traditional Chinese culture, and promote the healthy development of emerging cultural industries such as online games and sports live streaming, in accordance with the requirements of "prosperous development of cultural undertakings and industries". We should focus on the requirements of accelerating the construction of a unified national market, strengthen the protection of fair competition, try cases of unfair competition, trade secrets, trademarks and other cases in accordance with the law, and effectively regulate the market order. We should focus on the requirements of creating a market-oriented, legalized, and internationalized first-class business environment, conduct fair and impartial trials of foreign-related intellectual property cases, protect the legitimate rights and interests of both Chinese and foreign rights holders in accordance with the law, and strive to create a "preferred place" for resolving foreign-related intellectual property disputes. Implement the requirements of active justice and continue to promote the modernization of the concept of intellectual property trial. Intellectual property trials have strong professionalism, showing a synchronous increase in the number of cases received and economic and social development, an endless stream of new types of cases, more parties applying for litigation preservation, and a relatively high proportion of foreign-related disputes. We need to conduct in-depth research on the characteristics and laws of intellectual property cases, strengthen the analysis of the operational situation of trial work, continuously optimize trial concepts, improve litigation rules, and enhance trial capabilities. Based on China's national conditions, we should focus on intellectual property trial work and strive to achieve the unity of the "three effects". Intellectual property protection is a systematic project that must firmly establish the concept of "big protection", further improve the linkage mechanism between administrative protection and judicial protection, accelerate the unification of administrative law enforcement standards and judicial judgment standards, strive to create a closed-loop protection chain, and enhance the system's protection capabilities. We should actively extend our functions, focus on identifying problems in intellectual property protection from the development trend of cases, and actively provide judicial suggestions to relevant regulatory authorities, while also releasing typical cases of intellectual property protection, and further leveraging the guidance of judicial judgment norms