An important aspect of constructing China's independent legal knowledge system is to interpret the modernization of the Chinese style rule of law based on Chinese theory and Chinese scholarship, provide academic support for the prosperity of Chinese law, the development of Chinese rule of law, and the dissemination of Chinese jurisprudence, provide legal support for promoting the modernization of the country's governance system and capacity, and make new and greater contributions to the civilization of human rule of law. To achieve these goals, it is necessary to focus on enhancing the subjectivity and originality of Chinese legal research, refine new theories with academic rationality, summarize new practices with regularity, and endow legal thoughts, legal viewpoints, and legal propositions with new ideological, epochal, and cultural connotations. Revealing the legal and philosophical principles of the modernization of the rule of law in China is the central issue in constructing the independent knowledge system of Chinese law. Knowledge is a universally accepted achievement of understanding the world and an effective tool for humanity to transform the world. The modernization of Chinese style rule of law is the soil for generating Chinese legal knowledge, and also the field for practicing Chinese legal knowledge. The necessity and possibility of China's independent legal knowledge system all stem from the established choice of the modernization path of Chinese rule of law. The modernization of the Chinese style rule of law contains rich academic resources, which is an important academic topic in Chinese legal research in the new era. It is an important mission for Chinese legal researchers to conduct long-term, interdisciplinary, and cross-cultural academic research on the path of modernization of the Chinese style rule of law, and it is also a key link in constructing the independent knowledge system of Chinese legal science. Compared to the successful practice of the modernization of the rule of law in China, there is still a considerable gap in the ability and level of Chinese jurisprudence in academic propositions, academic ideas, academic viewpoints, academic standards, and academic discourse. We have not yet constructed and developed a systematic, relatively complete, and mature disciplinary system, academic system, and discourse system to interpret the development and changes of the rule of law in China since the founding of the People's Republic of China, and to interpret the achievements of the rule of law in contemporary China, The image of China's rule of law in academia is still unclear; To construct an independent knowledge system of Chinese law, it is necessary to use subjective and original legal research to provide a theoretical explanation of the "Chinese phenomenon" occurring in a specific time and space, reveal the legal and philosophical principles of the modernization of the Chinese style rule of law, and extract a symbolic concept of logical self-consistency from it; Using these concepts to explain China's vivid rule of law practice, summarize and refine the "Chinese phenomenon" into "theoretical facts," and then, based on a larger range of cross-cultural comparative research, abstract it into concepts and paradigms with certain universal significance, clarify the logic of their mutual regulation and systematic interaction within the knowledge system, and construct a contemporary Chinese legal knowledge system with subjectivity and originality, Thereby realizing "the revolution of terminology" and "the intellectualization of the rule of law in China". Based on and observing China's legal practice under the guidance of scientific theory is an important path to building China's independent legal knowledge system. According to "The Book of Rites", "No foundation, no text." The first step in building China's independent legal knowledge system is to achieve