It is of great significance to promote Chinese path to modernization. Digital technology is fully integrated into people's social interaction and daily life, and public services and social operation methods are also undergoing tremendous changes. Correctly handling "integrity" and "innovation" in the governance transformation of digital society is an important mission for the inheritance and development of social governance in the new era. Dialectically understand the relationship between "integrity" and "innovation" in the governance transformation of digital society. Firstly, the core of "integrity" and "innovation" in the governance transformation of digital society is coupled and unified. "Integrity" and "innovation" serve the same goal of social governance, both in order to make the people's sense of gain, happiness, and security more substantial, more secure, and more sustainable. Secondly, the "innovation" of digital society governance requires breaking the inefficient and mechanical governance methods in the original governance model, accumulating the digital information hardware and software foundation, and improving intelligent, efficient, sophisticated, and professional social governance capabilities. Finally, the "innovation" of digital society governance cannot be separated from the inclusive development of "integrity". "Innovation" transformation is based on inclusive development of "integrity". It is necessary to pay attention to the blank areas of the application of digital society governance and prevent the short board obstacles of the "wooden barrel principle". Maintain the social environment for vulnerable groups in the application of digital technology, and achieve effective convergence between the old and new orders. Continue to adhere to the "integrity" elements in the governance transformation of the digital society. Adherence to the "integrity" element is an inheritance of the benign factors of social governance, and is the cornerstone of achieving governance transformation in a digital society. In terms of serving the population, it is necessary to maintain the social atmosphere of the disadvantaged groups in the application of digital technology, highlight the cultural temperature, and expand service models and scenarios by providing technical assistance to the elderly, the disabled, and other groups, as well as preserving their original governance methods, to bridge the digital divide. In terms of governance methods, avoid promoting a "one size fits all" approach to digital society governance, improve the coexistence of new and old ways of social governance, maintain the adaptability of social governance objects, and consolidate the principle of "people centered" social governance reform. In terms of governance decision-making, it is necessary to always adhere to the guidance of party building, give full play to the leading and corrective role of overall decision-making, and avoid replacing "people" with "numbers", mechanizing social governance policies and causing digital governance to fail. In terms of governance objectives, it is necessary to promote the core goals of human and social development, improve the instrumental role of digital change in formulating social governance policies and providing social services, and take social policies and social service supply as governance effects. In terms of governance ethics, it is necessary to maintain the privacy of personal data, collect, analyze, and apply data in accordance with laws and regulations, and ensure the people's sense of security in the governance transformation of the digital society. Actively exert the "innovation" effectiveness in the governance transformation of the digital society. On the one hand, the governance transformation of the digital society should be an "iterative innovation" of the original governance effectiveness. want