"Professional titles" and "rural areas" seem to be different. However, in recent years, a "professional title craze" has arisen quietly in many villages in China, and a number of farmers have been rated as primary, intermediate and even senior professional titles. Through the evaluation of professional titles, the production quality of workers in the vast mountain villages has been effectively improved, which has injected a steady stream of endogenous power into the cause of rural revitalization. It is important to have a target in view for farmers to evaluate their professional titles. The farmers participating in the title review are all backbone personnel with corresponding professional skills who take agricultural production and operation as their profession, and are engaged in professional and technical work in family farms, farmers' cooperatives, agricultural enterprises and agricultural socialized organizations in relevant regions. In the specific assessment, the agricultural production scale, demonstration effect, service capacity, economic benefits and social impact it is engaged in are taken as the main basis. In short, the winner should not only have a solid foundation of agricultural practice, but also have a certain range of impact and demonstration role, which is the inevitable requirement of China's large-scale and intensive agricultural development for high-quality farmers. Making rural "local experts" have professional and technical identity not only helps the transformation of traditional agriculture to modern agriculture, but also improves the sense of access of high-quality farmers, so that farmers with skills can be seen and recognized, and more feel the social respect of the "farmer" profession. To evaluate the professional titles of farmers, the emphasis is on "adjusting measures to local conditions". Different from the traditional professional title evaluation, the evaluation objects are required to meet the standards in terms of education, papers, qualifications, etc. The professional title evaluation that "local scholars" participate in takes actual performance as the first element, which is more "grounded". The evaluation criteria are also more consistent with the characteristics of high-quality farmers: as long as they are engaged in agricultural production and operation, service industry development, drive farmers to generate income and increase income, pay attention to ecological protection, and abide by laws and regulations, These top farmers can participate in the professional title evaluation with "zero basis", or even directly "one step" to obtain the corresponding senior professional title. This "bottom-up" talent growth mode is just complementary to the "discipline class" training mode of traditional agricultural expert colleges and universities, which goes deep into the field. To some extent, it is also an active attempt to improve the existing professional title evaluation framework, explore and deepen the reform of professional title evaluation. Farmers' evaluation of professional titles will help fully release the effectiveness of this group in helping rural construction. In many grassroots pilot areas, farmers who have obtained professional titles can enjoy a variety of preferential policies, including giving priority to being included in regional talent projects, participating in the "special agricultural technician" plan as local experts, and enjoying preferential policies in terms of credit, financial guarantee, etc. stipulated by the state, which have greatly improved the "gold content" of farmers' professional titles. This will also encourage the winners to actively perform their social responsibilities, such as taking the lead in promoting and applying advanced technologies, organizing agricultural skills training projects, and helping farmers with relatively backward production capacity in pairs. Through the expansion of the social demonstration effect, more agricultural technicians will be attracted and driven to grow faster, so as to promote the promotion effect of professional and technical titles to achieve long-term normalization. To let more "local scholars" emerge and make great achievements, the relevant departments should also improve the relevant training and talent training system, and speed up the completion of the existing "weaknesses". The evaluation of rural professional titles has broken the standard of