"Because there was a dispute about queue jumping, no one dared to fight between the two people, during which there was a child crying for his father and mother..." Recently, a netizen took a video of multiple people fighting and fighting with his mobile phone, released it on a short video platform, and labeled it "against all acts of violence". As soon as the video was released, it caused heated discussion, and there were more than 10000 comments in a short time. Many people have seen similar exposure videos when they were brushing short videos. With the development of smart phones and short video platforms, there have been many social hot events in recent years, all of which were fermented by the exposure of mobile phone videos, such as the "high-speed rail overlords". However, with more and more such exposed videos, even becoming "traffic passwords", people can not help asking: Will shooting video exposure infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of others? Is it illegal for some photographers to clip videos, guide them with words, or even shout "human flesh search"? With these questions in mind, the reporter of the Rule of Law Daily carried out an investigation and interview. The video exposure has become the norm, which is suspected of violating the rights and interests of others. "How can our children not educate well? If you have any opinions, go to the police." "If you dare to scold others, I will scold you to death. It's really uneducated."... In August this year, a female passenger stopped because of a noisy child on the high-speed railway, which led to the swearing between the woman and three parents. Both sides have many threatening and insulting words in their words. The process was captured by a female passenger with her mobile phone and uploaded to the short video platform, which soon became popular. Related topics rushed to the hot search, and a large number of comments were made against the children's parents. As the faces of the three parents were clearly visible in the video, some netizens cut the front faces of the three parents, accompanied by words such as "a family without quality", and called on netizens to conduct "human flesh search". After the incident continued to ferment, the female passenger who shot and uploaded the video appealed "Please don't commit cyber violence, they can't commit such crimes" and deleted the relevant video. On social networking platforms and short video platforms, there are numerous similar exposure videos. Recently, the reporter interviewed nearly 30 netizens in Beijing, Tianjin, Shaanxi and other places at random. The interviewees all said that they had brushed or often brushed such exposed videos during the online process, including swearing in public, fighting, and uncivilized behavior in public places. Ms. Wang, from Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, told reporters that she would unconsciously take out her mobile phone to shoot records when she met with passers-by quarreling or arguing. "Once, when I was on the bus, I met an aunt and a girl who had a dispute about giving up their seats. The aunt scolded me badly. I took out my mobile phone to take a picture and posted it to the Internet to expose the insolent aunt, but few people saw it." Many interviewees said that when they brushed such exposed videos, their first feeling was that these uncivilized behaviors were outrageous and should be condemned. As for whether the video objectively and truly reflects the situation at that time, and whether the shooting and uploading of such videos are infringing, these questions will not be considered. Some interviewees also suggested that exposing and exposing uncivilized and immoral behaviors is a just act, which is to safeguard the public interest. "The Civil Code stipulates that a natural person enjoys the right of portrait, and the right of portrait is not