Recently, Mr. Wang, the applicant for enforcement, received a telephone call from a judge of the Xuzhou Intermediate People's Court in Jiangsu Province, in which the judge explained in detail the reasons why the project funds that Mr. Wang applied for enforcement could not be released to Mr. Wang temporarily because others applied for preservation. After knowing the specific situation, Mr. Wang expressed his understanding. "Explaining and persuading more to make people less confused" is a microcosm of Xuzhou Court's insistence on optimizing the judicial supply mechanism. In recent years, Xuzhou Court has deeply focused on the urgent needs of the people in the judicial field, optimized judicial services, encouraged officers and policemen to dare to do good deeds, practically implemented the heavy responsibilities, and did a good job in the trial execution and extension of judicial functions. It has promoted the improvement of judicial efficiency by taking practical measures to improve people's livelihood and benefit the people, promoted the improvement of the business environment under the rule of law, and promoted the improvement of judicial credibility. The referee reasoned more than a few words and the masses had less doubts. "This judgment has made a detailed explanation of the facts, the application of the law and the reasons. Although we lost the lawsuit, we are convinced." A lawyer took over the judgment of a property damage compensation dispute case made by Sun Shouming, a judge of the First People's Court of Xuzhou Intermediate Court, and said while reading it. "It is the duty of the judge to fully reason, and it is also the life of the judicial documents. Reasoning is to speak clearly and thoroughly, to solve doubts and doubts in a targeted way, and to let the parties know where they win and lose." Sun Shouming has a lot of experience in writing referee documents. Data shows that from January to August this year, the first instance interest litigation rate of Xuzhou two level courts reached 88.55%, rising two places in the province's ranking year on year; The rate of interest litigation in the second instance reached 90.33%, up 3 places in the province on a year-on-year basis. Behind the figures is the public's recognition of the interpretation and reasoning of Xuzhou Court's judicial documents, and also the practice of Xuzhou Court's police officers on the concept of "reasoning more in judicial documents, making people less confused". The judicial document is an objective reflection of the case trial and an important yardstick to measure the judicial capacity and the quality of the trial work of the police. In recent years, Xuzhou Court has taken the evaluation of the trial quality of cases as a powerful tool to strengthen the management of trial quality, as an important content and effective carrier of the practical activities of "I do practical things for the masses". In the evaluation process, we strictly distinguish the responsibility for handling quality defects from the responsibility for illegal trials, adhere to the principle of "combining subjective fault with objective behavior" to identify the responsibility for wrong cases, and force the performance of duties in the matter through post supervision. We will effectively link the case evaluation with the determination of trial responsibility, the performance appraisal of judges, and the promotion of judges. In order to further improve the trial quality, the Xuzhou court has frequently made practical calls: establish a centralized notification mechanism for typical development and reform cases in civil and commercial affairs, so that the judges of first instance can find the reasons for the judgment methods from the specific problems existing in the cases; We will introduce a mandatory retrieval mechanism for related cases and similar cases, resolve differences in the application of law, and constrain judges to make arbitrary decisions; The judicial business departments of Xuzhou Intermediate People's Court organized "expert consultation" for difficult and complicated cases, series of cases, etc. in the form of "film conference" and judicial work symposium, unified the legal application standards for typed cases, and promoted the improvement of trial quality...... The refined trial management brought about a qualitative and qualitative leap in the trial. From January to August this year, the first trial of Xuzhou Intermediate Court