"I regard power as a tool for personal wealth collection, and have repeatedly violated the bottom line of the law, resulting in today's situation..." recently, Zhangqing, the former general manager of Changzhou Hefeng grain purchase and Marketing Co., Ltd., who is waiting to be prosecuted, issued a late confession. Previously, the supervision committee of Liyang Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection in Jiangsu Province received clues about the handover of special inspections in the grain related field in Changzhou, reflecting the problems of Hefeng company, such as financial chaos, irregular capital inflow and outflow, and frequent abnormal cash withdrawals. Concerning the people's grain bags, the Liyang Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection soon set up an investigation team to carry out in-depth verification. Although Hefeng company is controlled by the state, the general manager Zhangqing and Liyang hope family farm Co., Ltd., as the legal representative, account for 15% and 34% of the shares respectively. In Hefeng company, Zhang Qing is responsible for the overall work of the company and has a great say in the acquisition, custody, sales of grain, fund management, etc. The investigation team decided to seek a breakthrough from the key figure Zhang Qing. "Why do Hefeng's company account and Zhang Qing's personal account always deposit and withdraw at the same time?" According to the clues, the investigation team went to the bank to check the bank flow of Hefeng company and Zhang Qing's personal accounts in recent 6 years, and found that the two accounts frequently had deposits and withdrawals on the same day and at the same time. According to the follow-up survey, Zhang Qing took a large amount of cash from the company's account and deposited it in his personal bank account. After several moves in his personal account, the funds eventually flowed to the futures market. After fixing the relevant evidence, the investigation team found Zhang Qing. After some exchanges, Zhang Qing, who was hard to justify, explained the fact that he had misappropriated 1.7 million yuan of grain purchase funds for futures trading in 2016, and revealed a new clue: "since 2017, in order to ensure the operation of the funds of my own agricultural cooperatives, I have fabricated and forged grain purchase orders for many times to transfer the funds of Hefeng company to cooperatives." When the investigation team wanted to know the details, Zhang Qing said that he could not remember clearly, but he recorded the details of misappropriation in the diary hidden in his office. "The actual purchase of 3945009 kg, the actual expenditure of 8669932 yuan", "the drying premium of 26858 yuan (from Fang Jun) on November 19", "Fang Jun 245000 yuan"... When carefully examining his five diaries, some strange words and the frequent name of "Fang Jun" made the investigation team realize that the problem is not simple. Can we rely on the data recorded in the diary to decipher the problems existing in the company's accounts? Who is Fang Jun and why is it related to him? The investigation team decided to make systematic crossing, collision, comparison and analysis of the data in the diary. Subsequently, Zhang Qing's various acts of corruption and bribery gradually surfaced. "What does' go from Fang Jun 'mean?" "What does' Fang Jun 2.45 million 'mean?" After step-by-step questioning, the investigation team gradually broke through Zhang Qing's psychological defense line, and Zhang Qing's methods of corruption through "raising excess grain" and "price difference grain" were also clearly displayed in front of the investigators. According to the investigation, in November, 2018, Hefeng company purchased more than 300 tons of wet grain, with a water content of about 25%. According to the industry standard, 45 tons of water should be deducted and settled as 255 tons. However, after drying by Hefeng company, the actual weight of this batch of wet grain was 265 tons, 10 tons more than the previous calculation. Zhang Qing did not include the "out of thin air" surplus grain in the company's accounts, but sold it to Hefeng company in the name of his relative Fang Jun at a price of 26000 yuan. The relevant funds were controlled and actually used by Zhang Qing. According to the secret words in the diary, the investigation team also found that Zhang Qing committed corruption in the form of "price difference grain". In june2019, Hefeng company plans to purchase more than 3800 tons of local grain reserves. According to the procedure, this batch of wheat was first purchased by Hefeng company, and then the price was set by the grain reserve management department. Following the clues provided by the diary figures, the investigators found that the actual purchase price of Hefeng company was more than 2210 yuan per ton, and the settlement price of the grain reserve management department was more than 2240 yuan per ton, resulting in a price difference of nearly 30 yuan per ton. Seeing that it was profitable, Zhang Qing sold this batch of grain reserves to Hefeng company at the price of 2240 yuan per ton in the name of Fang Jun, and took the price difference of more than 100000 yuan as his own. At present, Zhang Qing has been expelled from the party, and the suspected crime has been transferred to the procuratorial organ for examination and prosecution. "The state-owned holding companies involved in grain at the grass-roots level are responsible for the purchase, sale, storage and rotation of tens of millions of tons of grain reserves. Once they are inside the box, it is very easy to bring hidden dangers of food security, and even affect the people's grain bags." During the investigation, the case handlers found that the company's management was chaotic and the supervision was absent. "Especially for the absence of supervision over the top leaders, although the company has an internal supervision mechanism, the responsibilities of the enterprise management, the general meeting of shareholders and the board of directors are unclear, and a scientific corporate governance structure has not been formed, resulting in the virtual existence of supervision, and the enterprise senior executives rely on food for food repeatedly." In response to the problems exposed in this case, the Liyang Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision Commission formulated and issued a disciplinary inspection proposal and a supervision proposal, urging the competent business departments and grain purchase and sales enterprises to draw inferences from one instance, deepen rectification, plug institutional loopholes, supplement governance weaknesses, and promote the city's state-controlled mixed ownership enterprises to improve their management systems and strengthen fund management. (outlook new era)