Some new signs of being divorced from the masses have emerged in the information age: some grass-roots cadres are not good, unwilling and disdain to deal with the masses face-to-face, arrange work habits, roar on wechat, deal with things, often ask by phone, understand the situation and rely on the table. This unhealthy atmosphere is derided by some cadres as "management without meeting", which is worthy of vigilance. In reality, "no meeting" often leads to "no governance". For example, some village cadres go to the village during the day and return to the county at night. They go back to the village when they have something to do and don't go back when they have nothing to do. Their relationship with the masses has changed from "fish water relationship" to "frog water relationship". In the long run, bureaucracy may breed, leading to alienation between cadres and the masses, and even conflict. Some cadres are used to sitting in the office "remote control command", knowing the situation by reporting, arranging deployment, reading the report by telephone and evaluation work, and using the Internet instead of going to the grass-roots level. Although it can improve work efficiency, the grass-roots people's situation they know is not fresh and true, sometimes only stay in the general impression, and even take it for granted. If we understand the time difference between the two situations, we will deviate from reality when formulating policies, and make mistakes when promoting implementation. It is undeniable that new governance methods such as "do not meet for approval", "run more data and run less errands for the masses" do improve efficiency and facilitate the masses, but it is also easy to lead to inaccurate grass-roots governance. The picture can not replace the meeting, the phone can not replace the dialogue, and wechat can't take care of everything. For example, there are nearly 2000 people in a village, and only 500 people in the wechat group. In addition, many elderly people do not use smartphones, and the notification is often not in place. At this time, it is necessary to "meet and manage" to keep up in time. "Governance without meeting" has great harm, which will not only alienate the relationship between cadres and the masses, but also reduce the efficiency of grass-roots governance, and even lead to conflict between cadres and the masses. Therefore, we must identify the focus and resolutely eradicate it. To eradicate the "treatment without meeting" syndrome, we should be close to the masses psychologically, fear the masses emotionally and serve the masses in action. Grassroots party members and cadres are at the grassroots level and have direct contact with the masses. They should pay more attention to being close to, paying attention to and caring for the masses. We should fear the masses and always remember that the power in our hands is given by the people; We should be good at worshiping the masses as teachers and widely absorb the wisdom of the masses. In the face of the new challenges of profound changes in people's ideas and the continuous differentiation of interest demands, we should actively integrate into the grass-roots level and win the recognition of the people with visible and tangible achievements. Grassroots governance is related to the well-being of the masses. No matter how advanced technology and how innovative means are, cadres cannot be separated from the masses for a moment. We should be more intimate with the masses, more accurate in serving the masses, and try our best to answer the necessary question of grass-roots governance. (Xinhua News Agency)