Watsons finally apologized! On the evening of the 14th, Watson China issued a statement saying that Watson had cashed some orders when the inventory could be supported. Later, the cashing was suspended due to insufficient inventory. Watson decided to fulfill the remaining orders by replenishment. If I had known this, why did I have to start. Since the introduction of the "1 cent promotion mask" campaign, we must talk about it, abide by the spirit of the contract, and not fool and fool consumers. Once playing routine, it will inevitably be smashed and hit by consumers. Watson also said in the statement that he cursed the anchor of consumers as the personnel of cooperative third-party institutions. This statement still needs to be verified. Even if the anchor involved is indeed a member of a third-party organization, Watson can't get rid of the relationship, let alone the pot. The reason is very simple. The anchor openly abused consumers for "wanting to bite like a mad dog". It was in Watson's live broadcasting room in China. She "brought goods" for Watson. Her identity was "tied" with Watson. Her words hurt people. How can Watson shrug his shoulders and be the shopkeeper? Obviously, Watson has the responsibility to restrict the rules of the anchor involved, remind her to be kind to users, and have the right to ask her to abide by the law. Just think, if the anchor involved is morally corrupt, wouldn't Watson destroy himself by using such anchor to "bring goods"? Anyway, this live broadcast is a major accident. If it is directly broadcast by the manufacturer, we should reflect, correct, pay attention to the impact and cherish our own image. If you invite other anchors to "bring goods", you should also do the necessary constraints and management. For relevant platforms, we should also take a warning, not aphasia or loss of position. For example, we should take the responsibility of checking the online promotion activities, strictly prevent the online promotion that does not live up to the name, and do not let the cheating promotion become popular. We must block the door for those unreliable activities and do not support their broadcasting. We should have zero tolerance for those morally corrupt anchors, openly abuse consumers, be extremely arrogant, and do not deal with them seriously according to law and regulations. Do we still keep them for the new year? (Xinhua News Agency)