After just over two months, the US intelligence community began to hype COVID-19's traceability problem. Recently, the office of the director of intelligence of the United States released the so-called "declassified version" report on COVID-19's traceability problem, and brought out the theory of laboratory leakage. At the end of August this year, the US intelligence department issued a summary of the report, discrediting China without evidence. The scientific problem of intelligence agencies' involvement in virus tracing is a joke. However, the US government ordered intelligence agencies to conduct a 90 day "investigation" in a serious manner, first compile a summary, and then produce a full text, insisting on singing the old drama of the politicization of the epidemic to the end. Let's first look at the argument of the so-called "traceability report". The report began by criticizing China, saying that "the first known cases were found in China" and "China did not have enough expectations for the spread of the virus". It made it clear that this was not a real scientific report, but a script with a preset tone and guilty inference. Let's look at the evaluation method of the so-called "traceability report". The report said that the 4 intelligence agencies in the United States and the National Intelligence Council of the United States assessed their "low reliability". "The initial infection of COVID-19 may be due to natural contact with animal infected with the virus or related ancestral virus." Another 1 intelligence agencies evaluated the "mid reliability", saying that "the origin of COVID-19 is most likely to be related to a laboratory accident, which may involve experiments, animal processing or sampling of the Wuhan Institute of viruses". In fact, there is only one sentence in the whole article, and there is no reliable evidence to prove the "laboratory leakage theory". Let's look at the attribution of the so-called "traceability report". The report blamed the divergence of the US intelligence community on China's "tracing international investigation and refusing to share information", and "China's cooperation is needed to make a final assessment of the origin of COVID-19". What a fuss and confuse black and white! China's open and transparent attitude on virus traceability is obvious to the international community. In the early stage of the epidemic, China shared the virus gene sequence for the first time, and twice invited who experts to China to carry out traceability research and provide them with all convenience. In contrast, in the United States, the timeline of the domestic epidemic continues to advance, and the biological laboratories of Fort Detrick and the University of North Carolina are full of bad deeds, but they have never responded positively to international questions. This big hat of "obstructing international investigation" is most suitable for the United States. While the United States is busy weaving accusations against China, its domestic epidemic is deteriorating. According to the statistics of the New York Times, as of November 10, 98390 new confirmed cases had been added in a single day in the United States, with a total of more than 46.8 million confirmed cases and more than 759000 deaths. At such a critical juncture, politicians from both parties in the United States are still arguing over whether to vaccinate or not. Recently, Biden's executive order requiring more than 100 enterprise employees to be vaccinated with the new crown vaccine was judged as "unconstitutional" by an appeal court in New Orleans. Texas, Louisiana and other Republican states also strongly opposed the vaccine injunction, leaving the United States a step further away from widespread vaccination. The United States tried every means to "bring rhythm" to the issue of COVID-19's traceability, and kidnapped the so-called "two traceability" of China's development against China. The international community can see clearly this intention. Last month, who announced the list of proposed new expert groups on virus traceability. In the first stage, six experts who went to Wuhan, Hubei Province to participate in traceability research were selected again. They have made it clear that the Wuhan laboratory leakage hypothesis is "extremely unlikely". Instead of making up stories in vain and deliberately throwing dirty water, the United States might as well listen to the just voice of the international community against the politicization of traceability and return to the right path of scientific traceability and cooperative anti epidemic as soon as possible. (outlook new era)