At 22:14 on September 25, the Chinese government chartered plane of Chinese citizen Meng Wanzhou arrived at Shenzhen Bao'an International Airport. The cabin door opened. Meng Wanzhou walked out of the cabin and waved. The picture shows people welcoming Meng Wanzhou home at Shenzhen Bao'an International Airport on September 25. (photo source: People's vision) Meng Wanzhou made a brief speech at the airport. She said: "where there is a five-star red flag, there is a beacon of faith. If faith has color, it must be Chinese red!" then the welcoming crowd sang "sing about the motherland". After more than 1000 days of unreasonable detention in Canada, Meng Wanzhou finally returned to his motherland and reunited with his family. This is the result of the strong leadership of the Party Central Committee, the unremitting efforts of the Chinese government, the full support of the whole Chinese people, and a major victory for the Chinese people. The Meng Wanzhou incident is a concentrated epitome of the great changes that have not taken place in a century. The essence of the Meng Wanzhou incident is that the United States is trying to obstruct or even interrupt China's development process. China's efforts safeguard not only the rights of a citizen and the rights and interests of an enterprise, but also the rights of the Chinese people to live a better life and realize the modernization of the country. Through the Meng Wanzhou incident, the Chinese people have more clearly seen that the closer to national rejuvenation, the less smooth it will be, the more full of risks, challenges and even rough waves. In the face of the unprecedented changes in the world in a century, we must unswervingly follow our own path, persevere in doing our own things, achieve high-level scientific and technological self-reliance and self-improvement, and build a stronger great motherland. The Meng Wanzhou incident took place in the critical period of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation and in the great changes that have not taken place in the world in a century. In essence, the United States is trying to obstruct or even interrupt China's development process On December 1, 2018, under the planning of the United States, Meng Wanzhou was unreasonably detained by Canada without violating any Canadian law. "The Meng Wanzhou incident took place in the process of the United States launching a trade war and a science and technology war against China. It is by no means accidental and isolated," Liu Jianli, a researcher at the Institute of industrial economics of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told reporters. Looking back on history, China was also regarded as one of the poorest countries in the world in 1978. After more than 40 years of rapid growth of reform and opening up, China has created "two miracles" of rapid economic development and long-term social stability, which are rare in the world, and has become the second largest economy and the largest manufacturing country in the world. With this process, Chinese enterprises have gradually become bigger and stronger, and the breadth and depth of "going global" have been continuously expanded. From the perspective of enterprise development, the scale of Chinese enterprises and the number of large companies are increasing. Multinational corporations cultivated by China, especially manufacturing multinational corporations, begin to show increasingly strong competitiveness in the global market. In the list of Fortune 500 enterprises in 2020, 133 companies in China ranked first, surpassing the United States for the first time. In the 2021 world top 500 list, Chinese enterprises increased to 143; China's large enterprises have ranked first among the world's 500 powerful countries for three consecutive years; The operating income and net profit of Chinese enterprises are 91.26% and 75.00% of American enterprises respectively, and the gap is further narrowed. From the perspective of enterprises entering overseas markets, the "going global" of Chinese enterprises has evolved from trade-oriented entry to productive investment, and the location of direct investment has gradually expanded from developing countries to developed countries. Liu Jianli said that despite the pressure from the United States, Huawei and ZTE have remained the first and fourth market share in the global communication equipment industry in the past two years. In the manufacturing sector, China's consumer electronics products have performed well in overseas markets. Taking mobile phones as an example, although Huawei has been suppressed by the United States and its market share has decreased, the influence of China's mobile phone Corps in the global market has increased. Brands such as Xiaomi, oppo, vivo, glory and Yijia are favored by overseas consumers. Chinese household electrical appliance enterprises are also more and more brave in overseas markets. Household electrical appliance products of Haier, Hisense and other companies have successfully entered the mainstream markets in Europe and America. From the perspective of the development of strategic technology, Chinese enterprises have been in an international leading position in 5g, artificial intelligence and other fields, and are gradually promoting independent technology substitution in key core technology fields such as semiconductors. In the 5g communication equipment market, Huawei maintains the first global market share with its huge domestic market. Meanwhile, as the domestic manufacturer with the strongest independent and controllable ability in the field of IT technology and chips, Huawei has realized domestic substitution in many fields. In the countermeasure report provided to the government by Rand Corporation, an American think tank, in 2019, it clearly put forward specific countermeasures to contain China in the gray area between war and peace. "At present, the policies implemented by the United States are basically consistent with the countermeasures. In addition to the conventional science and technology competition strategy, the United States is increasingly using national strength and various unconventional means to disrupt the development pace of China's high-tech industry in order to maintain the technological hegemony of the United States," Liu Jianli said. According to Liu Jianli's analysis, the chip industry is the strategic commanding point of today's science and technology competition, which is related to the lifeblood of 5g and other digital technologies and national defense security, and has become the core field for the United States to implement science and technology containment against China. Huawei's sharp knife breakthrough in the chip field and its global leadership in 5g technology are unacceptable to the United States. The United States adopts the strategy of targeted attack on the "leader" of China's scientific and technological containment. As an American politician said, "attacking Huawei is equivalent to ten trade agreements". Since the 18th CPC National Congress, under the background of socialism with Chinese characteristics entering a new era, the Chinese nation is unprecedented close to the goal of great rejuvenation, and China is increasingly approaching the center of the world stage, the relationship between China and the world is undergoing historic changes. "The great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation is not only an organic part of the great change in the world in a century, but also an important driving factor. The great change in the world in a century not only provides conditions and opportunities for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, but also brings potential risks and challenges. The Meng Wanzhou incident is an epitome of the United States' obstruction of China's rise under the great change in a century." Liu Jianli told reporters that this unscrupulous crackdown is a concentrated reflection of the anxiety and hostility of the United States in dealing with China's rise. Under the background of the new industrial revolution, the United States, as the world's scientific and technological overlord, is worried that its position will be shaken and that China's rise will affect its position in the world political and economic order, Thus, it is a concrete manifestation of malicious obstruction to China, a rising developing power. The unilateralism and hegemonic thinking of the United States are doomed to be futile, and the United States moving against the trend is moving towards injustice and little help The occurrence of the Meng Wanzhou incident naked reflects the "unilateralism" pursued by the United States. Foreign Ministry spokesman Hua Chunying said on September 25 that the allegations of so-called "fraud" against Ms. Meng Wanzhou were pure fabrication. Even the HSBC Bank, which the United States refers to as the "victim", has issued documents sufficient to prove Ms. Meng's innocence. "The US government concocted the Meng Wanzhou incident not for any legal reasons. Its real purpose is to suppress Chinese high-tech enterprises and hinder China's scientific and technological development. What the Canadian government has done is an accomplice," said Diao Daming, associate professor of the school of international relations of Renmin University of China. In recent years, the "five eye alliance intelligence sharing system" led by the United States has been very active. The intelligence sharing mechanism established by the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand has long violated international law and the basic norms of international relations through secret cooperation, and has carried out large-scale, organized and undifferentiated network theft and monitoring on foreign governments, enterprises and individuals. In addition to sharing intelligence, the United States has also frequently encouraged the "five eye alliance" to unify its position and caliber and interfere in China's internal affairs on the issues of Hong Kong and Xinjiang under the guise of "human rights" and "freedom". The United States also coerced the "five eye alliance", excluded and suppressed Chinese high-tech enterprises, including Huawei, and prevented them from participating in the bidding of mobile communication equipment and technology of alliance countries. However, even if "Baotuan" acts as a "thug", members of the "five eye alliance" can not completely escape the situation of being suppressed by the United States. In the Meng Wanzhou incident, Canada's judicial system was independent, but it was restrained by the principle of "long arm jurisdiction" of the United States. Some commentators said: the United States let Canada catch the people of which country, and then hold the people waiting for the United States to say how to deal with them. Is this Canada the 51st state of the United States? As a tool of the United States, other members of the "five eyes alliance" may also be involuntarily - an anxious United States is kidnapping its allies with a strong cold war mentality and zero sum game, hurting the interests of its allies more and more deeply. Oliver fox, a German international political scholar, believes that the "five eyes" is actually "one big eye + four small eyes". The United States is the absolute protagonist, but the "four small eyes" are not willing to obey 100%, but they are still unable to get out of the control of the United States. Since the great discovery of Geography in the 15th century, economic globalization has continuously converged from the initial trickle to the rolling wave sweeping the world. It is the inevitable result of the evolution of historical logic, practical logic and theoretical logic, and its development trend is irreversible. Since World War II, the United Nations, the world bank, WTO and other institutions, as organizers of global public goods, have promoted the formation of a more effective global governance system and maintained the peace, progress and prosperity of the world. "For a big country, the decline of ideas is more dangerous than the decline of strength." Vice Foreign Minister Le Yucheng said bluntly: "In the era of multipolarization and globalization in the 21st century, we can't still think about looking for tools from the cold war toolbox, thinking about how to contain other countries, pull 'small circles', engage in group confrontation, and act according to the law of the jungle. These musty old ideas will certainly not work in today's world, will only harm others and ourselves, and will eventually be abandoned by the times." On June 22, at the 47th session of the United Nations Human Rights Council held in Geneva, Belarus made a joint statement on behalf of 65 countries, emphasizing that the affairs of Hong Kong, Xinjiang and Tibet are China's internal affairs and should not be interfered by the outside world, and supporting China's implementation of "one country, two systems" in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region The six member states of the Gulf Cooperation Council sent a collective letter to support China's position, and more than 20 countries supported China in the form of separate statements. "More than 90 countries have expressed support for China and said 'no' to Anti China 'small groups. This is the voice of justice of the international community and true multilateralism," said Le Yucheng. Dare to be good at struggle, strengthen the application of international rules, actively participate in the formulation of international rules, and earnestly safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests In recent years, the United States has continuously imposed sanctions on Chinese enterprises and restricted the development of Chinese enterprises through various means. In April 2020, the new American security center, an American think tank, released the report "new arsenal in Sino US competition - coercive economic measures" , revealed six types of coercive economic measures adopted by the United States in recent years: tariffs, export controls, investment restrictions on China, financial sanctions, restrictions on the import of products related to China, and law enforcement tools. From the ZTE case to the Meng Wanzhou incident, the United States used "long arm jurisdiction" to crack down on key enterprises and personnel in China. Whenever and wherever a company has traded in US dollars, signed a contract priced in US dollars, or sent and stored e-mail only through an e-mail server located in the United States, the United States government believes that it has jurisdiction over the company. Its basis