The General Administration of market supervision released a number of typical cases of inspection and testing market supervision and law enforcement, and JD Taobao and other e-commerce platform stores provided false quality inspection reports
2022-04-01
1. Jiangsu Shanghai railway station Speed Regulation Technology Center Co., Ltd. is suspected of issuing false inspection and detection report In September 2021, during the supervision and random inspection of national qualification certification inspection and testing institutions, the administrative supervisors found that the testing time of two reports (No.: jc2021029 and jc2021030) of Shanghai Railway Station Yard Speed Regulation Technology Center Co., Ltd. (station yard speed regulation equipment testing station of Shanghai Railway Bureau) was September 9 and September 14, 2021 respectively, and through the transfer of the company's equipment handover form, The sealing testing machine (equipment No.: 070711-01) used for testing was sent for repair on September 3, 2021. No equipment was found in the on-site inspection, and the company was unable to provide evidence of using the equipment for testing. In addition, the other four inspection and testing reports (No.: jc2021011-dx, jc2021013, jc2021018, jc2021026) failed to obtain qualification for pressure holding performance, dust-proof performance and other items. As the station master, technical director and authorized signatory of the organization, Xing has been transferred from the company in March 2021; The standard method TB / t2460-2016 has replaced TB / t2460-2009, and the company has not applied for change according to law. The company is suspected of violating Article 14 of the measures for the supervision and administration of inspection and testing institutions and Article 14 of the measures for the administration of qualification recognition of inspection and testing institutions, and issuing false inspection and testing reports. The case has been transferred to the local market supervision department for investigation, handling and punishment according to law. 2. Case of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences suspected of issuing false inspection and testing report In October 2021, during the supervision and random inspection of the national qualification certification inspection and testing institution, the administrative supervisors conducted an on-site inspection on the Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences [agricultural products quality supervision, inspection and testing center of the Ministry of agriculture and rural areas (Urumqi)], and found that the items such as Omethoate, isobenzuron and Metalaxyl in the inspection and testing report numbered 2021-n-1935 issued by the institution were not tested in accordance with gb23200 113-2018 standard stipulates parallel test; The amino acid test record in the inspection and test report numbered 2021-n-0525 shows that the test time of parallel samples is June 28, 2021 and July 2, 2021 respectively. The injection volume of standard working solution is 0.03ml and the injection volume of sample determination solution is 0.02ml, which is consistent with the standard method gb5009 The "working solution and sample determination solution are injected into amino acid analyzer in the same volume" specified in 124-2016 is inconsistent. In addition, the original legal representative of the institution was transferred from the institution in December 2018, and the institution did not apply for change according to law. The institution is suspected of violating Article 14 of the measures for the supervision and administration of inspection and testing institutions and Article 14 of the measures for the administration of qualification recognition of inspection and testing institutions, and issuing false inspection and testing reports. The case has been transferred to the local market supervision department for investigation, handling and punishment according to law, and transferred to the competent department of the industry at the same time. 3. False quality inspection reports provided by e-commerce platforms such as jd.com and Taobao In December 2021, the State Administration of market supervision received a report from the public that jiahuaxuan life furniture museum, Jianmei home life Museum, tmall suojianxuan flagship store and Jingdong stanao furniture flagship store were suspected of using fake inspection and testing reports in the advertising of sofa beds. The four e-commerce reports are printed with CMA logo, numbered dez190700092, and stamped with the special seal for inspection of Shenzhen detec Testing Co., Ltd., but the entrusting unit and inspection date are different. After receiving the report, the general administration immediately deployed Zhejiang market supervision and Administration Bureau, Beijing market supervision and Administration Bureau and Guangdong market supervision and Administration Bureau to carry out investigation and verification. Verified by the local market supervision department, Shenzhen detec Testing Co., Ltd. has not issued the test report with the number of dez190700092, and the test reports used by four e-commerce companies are fake reports. The company has made a statement. Foshan pumu Furniture Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of Jingdong stanao furniture flagship store, is unaware of the authenticity of the quality inspection report. At present, the company has been interviewed by Shunde District market supervision and Administration Bureau of Foshan City. The market supervision bureau of Zhejiang Province informed Alibaba (China) Co., Ltd. of the illegal acts of online stores involved, and required the platform to carry out investigation and disposal, strictly implement the main responsibility, and dispose of the e-commerce involving relevant stores according to law. At present, all 64 commodities displayed in the stores and advertised with fake reports have been taken off the shelves, and required the merchants to check and correct themselves and maintain close monitoring. 4. Case of Shandong Tianbing Safety Technology Service Co., Ltd. issuing false inspection and detection report of gas cylinder and air respirator On November 17, 2021, the market supervision bureau of Shandong Province received a report from the masses, reflecting that Tianbing (Shandong) Safety Technology Service Co., Ltd. issued a false inspection and testing report on gas cylinders and air respirators. On November 18, the law enforcement inspection bureau of the Bureau, together with the certification and accreditation office, the special supervision office and technical experts, conducted on-site law enforcement inspection on the company. On November 22, a case was filed for investigation to confirm the illegal facts. On February 18, 2022, the market supervision bureau of Shandong Province sent the administrative punishment decision to the party concerned, and made the punishment of revoking the qualification certificate of the inspection and testing institution and the approval certificate of the special equipment inspection and testing institution of Tianbing Safety Technology Service Co., Ltd. and the certificate of the special equipment inspection and testing personnel of the relevant responsible personnel of the institution. At the same time, it will be included in the list of serious violations and dishonesty, publicized through the national enterprise credit information publicity system, and transferred to the public security organ for further treatment. 5. Case of false inspection report issued by Chongqing Zhongke Construction Engineering Quality Inspection Co., Ltd On September 15, 2021, the inspection team of Chongqing market supervision bureau supervised and inspected Chongqing Zhongke Construction Engineering Quality Inspection Co., Ltd. and found that the company issued false inspection reports in the inspection of items such as "concrete water permeability resistance test" and "hot rolled ribbed reinforcement test". In the "mortar compressive strength test" test, reduce the steps that should be tested according to the standard, and issue a false test report. According to the investigation, during the inspection of "mortar compressive strength test" on September 11 and 12, the organization directly filled in the size data of the test piece without measuring the size of the test piece before the compressive strength test according to the standard requirements, and made the inspection conclusion accordingly. A total of 23 copies of mortar compressive strength test report were issued in two days. The above-mentioned acts violate the provisions of paragraph 2 (3) of Article 14 of the measures for the supervision and administration of inspection and testing institutions, and constitute an illegal act of changing key inspection and testing conditions and issuing false inspection and testing reports. During the "inspection of hot rolled ribbed steel bars" conducted on September 11 and 12, 2021, the company did not bend the steel bar specimen to 180 degrees according to the requirements of national standards, but recorded the bending angle of 180 degrees on the original record, and issued 19 inspection reports of "inspection report of hot rolled ribbed straightened steel bars". The above-mentioned acts violate the provisions of paragraph 2 (3) of Article 13 of the measures for the supervision and administration of inspection and testing institutions, and constitute an illegal act of issuing false inspection and testing reports. On February 18, 2022, Chongqing Jiulongpo District Market Supervision Bureau confiscated the company's illegal income totaling RMB 1981, and fined RMB 30000 for issuing false and false inspection and testing reports in accordance with Article 26 of the measures for the supervision and administration of inspection and testing institutions. At the same time, relevant illegal clues were transferred to Chongqing Municipal Commission of housing and urban rural development according to law. Chongqing Municipal Commission of housing and urban rural development is investigating the company according to the measures for the management of construction project quality monitoring and other provisions, and dealing with and punishing the company according to law. 6. Case of false special equipment inspection and testing results issued by Shandong Linyi Yi'an Yufeng gas cylinder testing Co., Ltd On April 8, 2021, Linyi Market Supervision Bureau conducted an on-site inspection on the gas cylinder inspection of Linyi Yi Yi'an Yufeng Gas Cylinder Inspection Co., Ltd. and found that from March 18 to April 8, the organization had not been used due to the computer failure of the hydraulic test bench, but had not been tested. It directly filled in the hydraulic test data in the inspection report, A total of 394 periodic inspection reports of industrial gas cylinders (steel seamless gas cylinders) and 79 periodic inspection reports of CNG gas cylinders (compressed natural gas metal liner fiber surrounded gas cylinders) were issued; Since January 2021, when the static evaporation rate of seven LNG cylinders (low-temperature insulated cylinders) has been tested for 3.5 hours, which can not meet the requirements of the standards and specifications, the organization has fabricated 24-hour test data without authorization, calculated the static evaporation rate and issued the test report. The above-mentioned acts violate the provisions of Articles 52 and 53 of the special equipment safety law of the people's Republic of China and constitute the issuance of false test data and results. In accordance with the provisions of Article 93 of the special equipment safety law of the people's Republic of China, Linyi Market Supervision Bureau ordered the institution to correct its illegal acts and revoked the approval certificate of its special equipment inspection and testing institution according to law. 7. Anhui Dangshan Xiangge Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. failed to obtain the qualification of inspection and testing institution to engage in inspection and testing activities In September 2021, the market supervision bureau of Dangshan County, Anhui Province found that Dangshan Xiangge Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. issued a pollution source treatment plan containing the detection data of formaldehyde content detected by non verified equipment to customers without obtaining the qualification certificate (CMA) of inspection and detection organization. According to Article 34 of the measures for the administration of the qualification of inspection and testing institutions, the market supervision bureau of Dangshan County, Anhui Province ordered him to make immediate corrections and fined 30000 yuan. 8. Case of Jiangsu Yong'an Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. Chuzhou Branch falsely using the qualification certificate of inspection and testing organization In June 2021, Anhui market supervision and Administration Bureau conducted on-site inspection on Chuzhou Branch of Jiangsu Yong'an Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. during the investigation of complaints and reports. After investigation, the company used its lease to inspect and test 25 construction elevators in an office at 1559 Ziwei South Road, Chuzhou city without obtaining the qualification, and issued the inspection report by falsely using the qualification certificate of Anhui Branch of Yong'an construction machinery testing Co., Ltd. According to Article 37 of the measures for the administration of qualification recognition of inspection and testing institutions, the Bureau fined Chuzhou Branch of Jiangsu Yong'an Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. 30000 yuan. 9. Case of false and false inspection and testing report issued by Guangdong Zhaoqing transportation vehicle comprehensive performance testing Co., Ltd In August 2021, Guangzhou Panyu District Market Supervision Bureau inspected Zhaoqing transportation vehicle comprehensive performance testing Co., Ltd. during the supervision and random inspection of qualification certification inspection and testing institutions. It was found that when the company inspected the external lighting equipment and signal devices of Guangdong arxxxx vehicles on July 30, 2021, the inspectors and the driver did not conduct interactive light inspection, resulting in the failure to actually inspect whether the far and low beam of the headlamp are normal, in violation of the relevant operating procedures of motor vehicle safety technical inspection items and methods (gb38900-2020), The inspection report issued shows that the inspection result of the item corresponding to "external lighting and signal equipment" is "qualified". From July to August 2021, during the second inspection of the servicing quality of four heavy trucks, the inspection result was "qualified" by adding personnel in the driver's seat to increase the servicing quality of the vehicles, and four false vehicle inspection reports were issued. According to Article 26 of the measures for the supervision and administration of inspection and testing institutions, the Bureau ordered the party concerned to make corrections and imposed a fine of 1755 yuan; At the same time, the qualification certificate of the company's inspection and testing organization was revoked in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 94 of the road traffic safety law of the people's Republic of China. ten
Edit：Li Ling Responsible editor：Chen Jie
Source：State Administration for Market Regulation
Special statement: if the pictures and texts reproduced or quoted on this site infringe your legitimate rights and interests, please contact this site, and this site will correct and delete them in time. For copyright issues and website cooperation, please contact through outlook new era email：lwxsd@liaowanghn.com
Sci-Tech
Recommended Reading Change it 
Home
