The newly revised Regulations on Disciplinary Actions of the CPC has added provisions on punishment of giving gifts in the name of lecture fees, project fees, consulting fees, etc. in disguised form, aiming at the potential growth and hidden variation of the "four styles" and improving the provisions on punishment of spiritual acts violating the eight central regulations. The newly added clause sends a clear signal of maintaining a vigilant and uncompromising high-pressure stance on the issue of the "Four Winds" wearing vests. Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, through continuous and in-depth rectification, the "Four Winds" problems that occur in the eyes of cadres and the masses have been significantly reduced, the party and government conduct has been revitalized, and the social and public conduct has continued to improve. But under the high-pressure situation, some stubborn work styles have changed their ways and gone from light to dark, trying every means to avoid supervision. Whether it's lecture fees, project fees, consulting fees, handling fees, or under the guise of other expenses, the essence behind it is still the illegal collection and giving of gifts and gifts. Taking lecture fees as an example, it is understandable for Party members, cadres, and public officials to be invited to participate in systematic or industry training, seminars, scientific research and other activities, conduct lectures, consultations, and guidance, and receive reasonable remuneration within the prescribed scope, relying on their solid and professional business abilities. This is not only necessary for carrying out work, but also a respect for labor. However, in reality, some enterprises or units often distribute so-called "lecture fees" under the guise of academic conferences, scientific research collaborations, etc. in order to achieve profit goals, which has actually become a common practice in some industries. From the typical cases investigated and dealt with in recent years, it can be seen that some lecture fees were not strictly implemented according to the document regulations, greatly exceeding the limit amount; Some people, under the guise of "lectures," actually do not give lectures, but instead falsely claim expenses under the guise of "lecture fees," and use them to obtain training funds for gift giving and profit sharing. It is worth noting that the payment form of "lecture fees" is becoming increasingly covert. In order to avoid supervision, some pay by WeChat, Alipay and other means, and the transaction amount is getting smaller and smaller, the frequency is getting more and more frequent, the concealment is very strong, and it is difficult to be found. Starting from specific issues such as "lecture fees", we will normalize the rectification of old problems and new situations. The disciplinary inspection and supervision organs should refine a pair of "keen eyes", penetrate the surface to see the essence of the problem, accurately identify and seriously investigate such violations and disciplinary actions. After receiving relevant clues, it is necessary to determine whether the teaching behavior is true, and based on the investigation results, determine whether there is a phenomenon of "only receiving money but not doing work", whether there is personal explanation and real labor put in. Secondly, check if the teaching process is compliant. Has the speaker completed the approval procedures with the department of their unit and has there been any unauthorized behavior of going out to give lectures. Especially for leading cadres, special attention should be paid to whether they truthfully fill in their personal reports on matters related to teaching, consulting, and other labor income. Furthermore, it also depends on whether the teaching fee standard is reasonable. Starting from the details of the lecturer's financial transactions and abnormal deposits, and through data analysis, identify the "tail" of hidden mutations. The emergence of hidden variations such as "lecture fees" and the "four winds" problem is caused by multiple factors such as ideological deviation, insufficient institutional constraints, and lack of supervision and management. It is necessary to grasp the deep-seated factors, strengthen the treatment of both symptoms and root causes, and implement systematic measures. It is particularly important to remind that while deepening rectification, all regions should also guard their borders and boundaries